Clinton Castro

447 total citations
26 papers, 136 citations indexed

About

Clinton Castro is a scholar working on Safety Research, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Clinton Castro has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 136 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Safety Research, 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Clinton Castro's work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (12 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Clinton Castro is often cited by papers focused on Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (12 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Clinton Castro collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Singapore. Clinton Castro's co-authors include Alan Rubel, David P. O'Brien, Michele Loi, Mei‐Chen Hu, Laura Brandt, Gabriel Odom, Raymond R. Balise, Daniel J. Feaster, Laura A. Brandt and Barbara M. Masini and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Addiction and npj Digital Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Clinton Castro

21 papers receiving 128 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Clinton Castro United States 8 72 54 43 32 19 26 136
Carina Prunkl United Kingdom 7 50 0.7× 24 0.4× 37 0.9× 23 0.7× 32 1.7× 11 123
Marcelo Prates Brazil 2 43 0.6× 12 0.2× 111 2.6× 15 0.5× 13 0.7× 5 190
William Bülow Sweden 8 47 0.7× 15 0.3× 5 0.1× 58 1.8× 17 0.9× 25 147
Jai Galliott Australia 7 48 0.7× 43 0.8× 23 0.5× 37 1.2× 4 0.2× 26 146
Janina Loh Austria 6 31 0.4× 23 0.4× 9 0.2× 15 0.5× 3 0.2× 8 79
JP Prims United States 3 11 0.2× 10 0.2× 10 0.2× 34 1.1× 3 0.2× 4 115
Edward Santow Australia 4 13 0.2× 11 0.2× 7 0.2× 10 0.3× 3 0.2× 10 61
Sebastian Köhler Germany 8 20 0.3× 64 1.2× 7 0.2× 6 0.2× 4 0.2× 25 130
Matthias F. C. Hudecek Germany 7 11 0.2× 10 0.2× 32 0.7× 11 0.3× 35 1.8× 15 123
Matthew Nyaaba United States 6 19 0.3× 4 0.1× 44 1.0× 3 0.1× 28 1.5× 16 126

Countries citing papers authored by Clinton Castro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton Castro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton Castro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton Castro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton Castro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton Castro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton Castro. The network helps show where Clinton Castro may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clinton Castro

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clinton Castro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clinton Castro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clinton Castro. Clinton Castro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brandt, Laura, et al.. (2025). Engaging an advisory board in discussions about the ethical relevance of algorithmic bias and fairness. npj Digital Medicine. 8(1). 292–292.
2.
Castro, Clinton & Michele Loi. (2025). The representative individuals approach to fair machine learning. AI and Ethics. 5(4). 3871–3881.
3.
Brandt, Laura, et al.. (2024). Empirically contrasting urine drug screening‐based opioid use disorder treatment outcome definitions. Addiction. 119(7). 1289–1300. 3 indexed citations
4.
Castro, Clinton, et al.. (2024). Kantian Ethics and the Attention Economy. 7 indexed citations
5.
Castro, Clinton. (2024). Broomean(ish) Algorithmic Fairness?. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 42(2). 639–651. 2 indexed citations
6.
Castro, Clinton, et al.. (2024). Should I Use ChatGPT to Write My Papers?. Philosophy & Technology. 37(4). 8 indexed citations
7.
Castro, Clinton, et al.. (2024). Does predictive sentencing make sense?. Inquiry. 1–20. 1 indexed citations
8.
Castro, Clinton & Michele Loi. (2023). Correction: The Fair Chances in Algorithmic Fairness: A Response to Holm. Res Publica. 29(2). 339–340.
9.
Odom, Gabriel, Laura A. Brandt, Clinton Castro, et al.. (2023). Capturing drug use patterns at a glance: An n-ary word sufficient statistic for repeated univariate categorical values. PLoS ONE. 18(9). e0291248–e0291248. 3 indexed citations
10.
Rubel, Alan, et al.. (2021). Algorithms and Autonomy. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 21 indexed citations
11.
Rubel, Alan, et al.. (2021). Democratic Obligations and Technological Threats to Legitimacy: PredPol, Cambridge Analytica, and Internet Research Agency. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 1 indexed citations
12.
Castro, Clinton, et al.. (2021). Fairness and Machine Fairness. 446–446. 1 indexed citations
13.
Rubel, Alan, et al.. (2020). Algorithms, Agency, and Respect for Persons. Social Theory and Practice. 46(3). 547–572. 10 indexed citations
14.
Rubel, Alan, et al.. (2019). Agency Laundering and Information Technologies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
15.
Rubel, Alan, et al.. (2019). Agency Laundering and Information Technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 22(4). 1017–1041. 23 indexed citations
16.
Castro, Clinton. (2019). What's Wrong with Machine Bias. Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 6(20201214). 13 indexed citations
17.
Castro, Clinton, et al.. (2017). Ideal counterpart theorizing and the accuracy argument for probabilism. Analysis. 78(2). 207–216. 2 indexed citations
18.
Castro, Clinton, et al.. (2017). The imprecise impermissivist’s dilemma. Synthese. 196(4). 1623–1640. 2 indexed citations
19.
Castro, Clinton, et al.. (2010). AN E/M-LEARNING ARCHITECTURE BASED ON ADAPTIVE TESTING. 3801–3807.
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carina Prunkl Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marcelo Prates Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by William Bülow Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jai Galliott Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janina Loh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by JP Prims Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Edward Santow Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sebastian Köhler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matthias F. C. Hudecek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matthew Nyaaba
Rankless by CCL
2026