Clinton Castro
- Safety Research top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Artificial Intelligence
- Sociology and Political Science
- Health Informatics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Alan RubelDavid P. O'BrienMichele LoiMei‐Chen HuLaura BrandtGabriel OdomRaymond R. BaliseDaniel J. Feaster
- Topics
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (12 papers)Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalySingapore
In The Last Decade
Clinton Castro
21 papers receiving 128 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Safety Research 72
- Cognitive Neuroscience 54
- Artificial Intelligence 43
- Sociology and Political Science 32
- Health Informatics 19
Countries citing papers authored by Clinton Castro
This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton Castro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton Castro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton Castro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton Castro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton Castro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton Castro. The network helps show where Clinton Castro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clinton Castro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clinton Castro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clinton Castro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clinton Castro. Clinton Castro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | Democratic Obligations and Technological Threats to Legitimacy: PredPol, Cambridge Analytica, and Internet Research Agency | 1 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | AN E/M-LEARNING ARCHITECTURE BASED ON ADAPTIVE TESTING | 0 |
| 20 | 0 |
About Clinton Castro
Clinton Castro is a scholar working on Safety Research, Health Informatics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 26 papers that have together received 136 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (12 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (19 citations), Safety Research (72 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (54 citations). Clinton Castro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Alan Rubel, David P. O'Brien, Michele Loi, Mei‐Chen Hu, Laura Brandt, Gabriel Odom, Raymond R. Balise, Daniel J. Feaster, Laura A. Brandt and Barbara M. Masini. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Addiction and npj Digital Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.