Clemmont E. Vontress
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Education top 10%
- General Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Joseph H. Fichter
- Topics
- Counseling Practices and Supervision (15 papers)Race, History, and American Society (5 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Counseling PsychologyJournal of Counseling & DevelopmentThe Journal of Negro Education
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Clemmont E. Vontress
34 papers receiving 490 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Social Psychology 414
- Clinical Psychology 272
- Sociology and Political Science 140
- Education 95
- General Psychology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Clemmont E. Vontress
This map shows the geographic impact of Clemmont E. Vontress's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clemmont E. Vontress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clemmont E. Vontress more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clemmont E. Vontress
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clemmont E. Vontress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clemmont E. Vontress. The network helps show where Clemmont E. Vontress may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clemmont E. Vontress
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clemmont E. Vontress. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clemmont E. Vontress based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clemmont E. Vontress. Clemmont E. Vontress is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | Empathy in cross-cultural psychotherapy. | 2 |
| 3 | Interview with a Traditional African Healer. | 6 |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | Existential Anxiety: Implications for Counseling. | 2 |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | Self-Hatred in Americans of African Descent. | 3 |
| 13 | The Black Militant as a Counselor. | 4 |
| 14 | 113 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 50 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Clemmont E. Vontress
Clemmont E. Vontress is a scholar working on General Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (15 papers), Race, History, and American Society (5 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (64 citations), Social Psychology (414 citations) and Clinical Psychology (272 citations). Clemmont E. Vontress has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph H. Fichter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Counseling Psychology, Journal of Counseling & Development and The Journal of Negro Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.