Clement L. Trempe
- Ophthalmology top 0.1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 0.5%
- Neurology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Charles L. SchepensAlex E. JalkhJ. Wallace McMeelMarcos Pereira de ÁvilaTaiichi HikichiJun AkibaGilbert T. FekeJohn J. Weiter
- Topics
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments (53 papers)Retinal and Macular Surgery (50 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanGermany
In The Last Decade
Clement L. Trempe
104 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Ophthalmology 3.3k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.6k
- Neurology 672
- Molecular Biology 482
- Epidemiology 284
Countries citing papers authored by Clement L. Trempe
This map shows the geographic impact of Clement L. Trempe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clement L. Trempe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clement L. Trempe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clement L. Trempe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clement L. Trempe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clement L. Trempe. The network helps show where Clement L. Trempe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clement L. Trempe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clement L. Trempe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clement L. Trempe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clement L. Trempe. Clement L. Trempe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | Localized Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning in Patients With Early Glaucoma or Alzheimer`s Disease | 4 |
| 3 | Different Patterns of Retinal Nerve Fiber Loss in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma versus Patients With Inflammatory Optic Neuropathy Demonstrated With OCT | 2 |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 66 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Clement L. Trempe
Clement L. Trempe is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 106 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (53 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (50 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (3.3k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.6k citations) and Neurology (672 citations). Clement L. Trempe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Charles L. Schepens, Alex E. Jalkh, J. Wallace McMeel, Marcos Pereira de Ávila, Taiichi Hikichi, Jun Akiba, Gilbert T. Feke, John J. Weiter, Masataka Takahashi and Fatmire Berisha. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.