Clemens Holzmann

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
53 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Clemens Holzmann is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Clemens Holzmann has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 26 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 14 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Clemens Holzmann's work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (16 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (14 papers) and Augmented Reality Applications (10 papers). Clemens Holzmann is often cited by papers focused on Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (16 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (14 papers) and Augmented Reality Applications (10 papers). Clemens Holzmann collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Clemens Holzmann's co-authors include Andreas Riegler, Andreas Riener, Alois Ferscha, Thomas Holleczek, Daniel Roggen, Paul Lukowicz, Ricardo Chavarriaga, Alberto Calatroni, David Bannach and Gerald Pirkl and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computer Graphics Forum and Computer Communications.

In The Last Decade

Clemens Holzmann

52 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Collecting complex activity datasets in highly rich networked sensor environments

2010 524 citations Daniel Roggen, Alberto Calatroni et al. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) profile →

Peers

Clemens Holzmann

CVPR

HI

AI

CNC

SP

Matthias Kranz Germany

Ig-Jae Kim South Korea

Dirk Colbry United States

Tsutomu Terada Japan

Yuri Ivanov United States

Reza Rawassizadeh United States

Gierad Laput United States

Christos Efstratiou United Kingdom

Taşkın Padır United States

Antonio Sgorbissa Italy

Matthias Kranz Germany

Clemens Holzmann

565 ×0.7

CVPR

519 ×1.6

HI

95 ×0.4

AI

278 ×1.2

CNC

76 ×0.3

SP

Citations per year, relative to Clemens Holzmann Clemens Holzmann (= 1×) peers Matthias Kranz

Countries citing papers authored by Clemens Holzmann

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clemens Holzmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clemens Holzmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clemens Holzmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clemens Holzmann

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clemens Holzmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clemens Holzmann. The network helps show where Clemens Holzmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clemens Holzmann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clemens Holzmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clemens Holzmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clemens Holzmann. Clemens Holzmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Riegler, Andreas, Andreas Riener, & Clemens Holzmann. (2022). Towards Personalized 3D Augmented Reality Windshield Displays in the Context of Automated Driving. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 8 indexed citations

2.

Riegler, Andreas, Andreas Riener, & Clemens Holzmann. (2021). Augmented Reality for Future Mobility: Insights from a Literature Review and HCI Workshop. i-com. 20(3). 295–318. 24 indexed citations

3.

Riegler, Andreas, Christoph Anthes, Hans-Christian Jetter, et al.. (2020). Cross-Virtuality Visualization, Interaction and Collaboration.. 10 indexed citations

4.

Riegler, Andreas, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, & Clemens Holzmann. (2019). Augmented Reality Windshield Displays and Their Potential to Enhance User Experience in Automated Driving. i-com. 18(2). 127–149. 31 indexed citations

5.

Riegler, Andreas, Andreas Riener, & Clemens Holzmann. (2019). Virtual reality driving simulator for user studies on automated driving. 502–507. 20 indexed citations

6.

Riegler, Andreas, Andreas Riener, & Clemens Holzmann. (2019). Adaptive Dark Mode: Investigating Text and Transparency of Windshield Display Content for Automated Driving. Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI). 8 indexed citations

7.

Riegler, Andreas, Andreas Riener, & Clemens Holzmann. (2019). Towards Dynamic Positioning of Text Content on a Windshield Display for Automated Driving. 1–2. 9 indexed citations

8.

Stiglbauer, Barbara, et al.. (2018). It is not rocket science. It is collaborative play for old and young!. 1–7. 4 indexed citations

9.

Holzmann, Clemens, et al.. (2017). Evaluating the placement of arm-worn devices for recognizing variations of dynamic hand gestures. Journal of Multimedia. 12. 225–242. 4 indexed citations

10.

Holzmann, Clemens, et al.. (2017). An android toolkit for supporting field studies on mobile devices. 473–479. 4 indexed citations

11.

Riegler, Andreas & Clemens Holzmann. (2015). UI-CAT. 390–394. 10 indexed citations

12.

Holzmann, Clemens, et al.. (2013). MobiZone. 1–10. 3 indexed citations

13.

Holzmann, Clemens, et al.. (2012). Automated and unsupervised user interaction logging as basis for usability evaluation of mobile applications. 118–118. 36 indexed citations

14.

Holzmann, Clemens, et al.. (2011). Vision-based distance and position estimation of nearby objects for mobile spatial interaction. 339–342. 2 indexed citations

15.

Lukowicz, Paul, Gerald Pirkl, David Bannach, et al.. (2010). Recording a Complex, Multi Modal Activity Data Set for Context Recognition. 1–166. 20 indexed citations

16.

Holzmann, Clemens & Alois Ferscha. (2010). A framework for utilizing qualitative spatial relations between networked embedded systems. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. 6(3). 362–381. 8 indexed citations

17.

Roggen, Daniel, Kilian Förster, Alberto Calatroni, et al.. (2009). OPPORTUNITY: Towards opportunistic activity and context recognition systems. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 28. 1–6. 69 indexed citations

18.

Holzmann, Clemens. (2007). Rule-based reasoning about qualitative spatiotemporal relations. 49–54. 8 indexed citations

19.

Ferscha, Alois, et al.. (2006). The Key Knob. 62–62. 1 indexed citations

20.

Ferscha, Alois, et al.. (2005). Orientation sensing for gesture-based interaction with smart artifacts. Computer Communications. 28(13). 1552–1563. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact