Cleber José da Silva
- Food Science top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Luiz C. A. BarbosaAntônio J. DemunerAntônio Lelis PinheiroRicardo Marques MontanariNélio José de AndradeCélia R. A. MalthaFyaz M.D. IsmailJaciana dos Santos Aguiar
- Topics
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (6 papers)Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (6 papers)Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers)
- Journals
- MoleculesBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on CancerAustralian Journal of Botany
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Cleber José da Silva
17 papers receiving 491 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Food Science 289
- Plant Science 276
- Molecular Biology 181
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 60
- Biochemistry 54
Countries citing papers authored by Cleber José da Silva
This map shows the geographic impact of Cleber José da Silva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cleber José da Silva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cleber José da Silva more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cleber José da Silva
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cleber José da Silva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cleber José da Silva. The network helps show where Cleber José da Silva may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cleber José da Silva
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cleber José da Silva. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cleber José da Silva based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cleber José da Silva. Cleber José da Silva is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 88 | |
| 15 | 71 | |
| 16 | 66 | |
| 17 | 56 | |
| 18 | 21 |
About Cleber José da Silva
Cleber José da Silva is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Food Science and Plant Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (6 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (6 papers) and Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (289 citations), Biochemistry (54 citations) and Plant Science (276 citations). Cleber José da Silva has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Luiz C. A. Barbosa, Antônio J. Demuner, Antônio Lelis Pinheiro, Ricardo Marques Montanari, Nélio José de Andrade, Célia R. A. Maltha, Fyaz M.D. Ismail, Jaciana dos Santos Aguiar, Renata Maria Strozi Alves Meira and Márcia C.C. de Oliveira. Their work appears in journals such as Molecules, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer and Australian Journal of Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.