Claus Lang‐Koetz

477 total citations
24 papers, 293 citations indexed

About

Claus Lang‐Koetz is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management and Pollution. According to data from OpenAlex, Claus Lang‐Koetz has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 293 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 6 papers in Strategy and Management and 5 papers in Pollution. Recurrent topics in Claus Lang‐Koetz's work include Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (7 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (5 papers) and Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (5 papers). Claus Lang‐Koetz is often cited by papers focused on Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (7 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (5 papers) and Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (5 papers). Claus Lang‐Koetz collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Claus Lang‐Koetz's co-authors include Jörg Woidasky, Frank Wagner, Piotr Putyra, Welmoed Veurman, Andreas Hinsch, Uli Würfel, Guojun Gao, Klaus Fichter, Dmitry Busko and Tobias Viere and has published in prestigious journals such as Resources Conservation and Recycling, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Claus Lang‐Koetz

23 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Claus Lang‐Koetz Germany	9	91	81	70	68	50	24	293
Venkat Aryan Germany	10	138 1.5×	97 1.2×	66 0.9×	23 0.3×	15 0.3×	14	382
Weichen Lin China	15	65 0.7×	63 0.8×	45 0.6×	66 1.0×	55 1.1×	24	661
Ramon Christian Eusebio Philippines	10	48 0.5×	35 0.4×	84 1.2×	32 0.5×	17 0.3×	30	329
Mattia Costamagna Italy	9	51 0.6×	38 0.5×	56 0.8×	63 0.9×	68 1.4×	15	254
Tihomir Tomić Croatia	11	275 3.0×	85 1.0×	100 1.4×	42 0.6×	44 0.9×	15	489
Emrah Alkaya Türkiye	12	77 0.8×	65 0.8×	120 1.7×	42 0.6×	14 0.3×	17	590
Eri Amasawa Japan	13	39 0.4×	34 0.4×	116 1.7×	40 0.6×	21 0.4×	30	378
Xuandong Chen China	10	28 0.3×	50 0.6×	72 1.0×	39 0.6×	50 1.0×	26	443
Ali Harlin Finland	10	14 0.2×	22 0.3×	109 1.6×	25 0.4×	41 0.8×	39	403
Elvis Djam Miensah China	11	61 0.7×	33 0.4×	74 1.1×	117 1.7×	231 4.6×	18	534

Countries citing papers authored by Claus Lang‐Koetz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claus Lang‐Koetz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claus Lang‐Koetz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claus Lang‐Koetz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claus Lang‐Koetz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claus Lang‐Koetz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claus Lang‐Koetz. The network helps show where Claus Lang‐Koetz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claus Lang‐Koetz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claus Lang‐Koetz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claus Lang‐Koetz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claus Lang‐Koetz. Claus Lang‐Koetz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Lang‐Koetz, Claus, et al.. (2023). Ambidextres Innovationsmanagement in KMU.

2.

Bilgram, Volker, et al.. (2023). Generative KIs in Kreativprozessen: Praxiserfahrungen aus den ersten Monaten mit ChatGPT & Co.. OHMdok (Technische Hochschule Nürnberg). 1 indexed citations

3.

Lang‐Koetz, Claus, et al.. (2023). Screening life cycle assessment of medical workwear and potential mitigation scenarios. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 40. 602–612. 5 indexed citations

4.

Lang‐Koetz, Claus, et al.. (2022). Circular Economy – Chance für Innovation – Eine Methode zur kreativen Entwicklung von Circular-Economy-Geschäftsmodellen. 2022(1). 33–36. 1 indexed citations

5.

Lang‐Koetz, Claus, et al.. (2022). Contextual Ambidexterity: Tackling the Exploitation and Exploration Dilemma of Innovation Management in SMEs. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management. 19(2). 9 indexed citations

6.

Woidasky, Jörg, et al.. (2022). Object Identification Technologies as Key Enabler for Circular Business Models‡. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 94(4). 479–492. 4 indexed citations

7.

Schmidt, Jannick, et al.. (2021). Challenges and Solutions for Plastic Packaging in a Circular Economy. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 93(11). 1751–1762. 20 indexed citations

8.

Woidasky, Jörg, Manfred Auer, Johan A. Schmidt, et al.. (2021). „Tracer-Based-Sorting“ in der Verpackungs-Abfallwirtschaft. Müll und Abfall. 3 indexed citations

9.

Woidasky, Jörg, et al.. (2020). Plastics Recycling with Tracer-Based-Sorting: Challenges of a Potential Radical Technology. Sustainability. 13(1). 258–258. 42 indexed citations

10.

Woidasky, Jörg, et al.. (2020). Kunststoffidentifikation und ‐sortierung in der Circular Economy durch Fluoreszenzmarker. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 92(4). 441–451. 17 indexed citations

11.

Lang‐Koetz, Claus, et al.. (2016). Integrating Resource Efficiency in Learning Factories for Industrial Engineering. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 1 indexed citations

12.

Lang‐Koetz, Claus, et al.. (2016). Corporate and Grassroot Frugal Innovation: A Comparison of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies. Technology Innovation Management Review. 6(4). 5–17. 2 indexed citations

13.

Lang‐Koetz, Claus, et al.. (2016). Corporate and Grassroot Frugal Innovation: A Comparison of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies. Technology Innovation Management Review. 6(4). 5–17. 27 indexed citations

14.

Färber, Michael, et al.. (2015). Technologien frühzeitig erkennen - Nutzenpotenziale systematisch bewerten. 1 indexed citations

15.

Späth, Dieter, et al.. (2010). Managing new technologies for resource efficient innovations: Results from current studies. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 1–12. 1 indexed citations

16.

Wagner, Frank, et al.. (2010). Technologiemonitoring: Technologien identifizieren, beobachten und bewerten. 5 indexed citations

17.

Rohn, Holger, et al.. (2009). Identifikation von Technologien, Produkten und Strategien mit hohem Ressourceneffizienzpotenzial: Ergebnisse eines kooperativen Auswahlprozesses; Meilensteinbericht aus dem Arbeitspaket 1 des MaRess-Projekts. Publication Server of the Wuppertal Institute (Wuppertal Institute). 1 indexed citations

18.

Rohn, Holger, et al.. (2009). Identification of technologies, products and strategies with resource efficiency potential : results of a cooperative selection process ; milestone report from work package 1 of the MaRess project. Publication Server of the Wuppertal Institute (Wuppertal Institute). 4 indexed citations

19.

Hinsch, Andreas, et al.. (2009). Scaling-up of glass based DSC-modules for applications in building integrated photovoltaics. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 937–941. 2 indexed citations

20.

Lang‐Koetz, Claus, et al.. (2006). Life cycle e-Valuation: Produkt, Service, System. Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact