Chemie Ingenieur Technik

13.4k papers and 67.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.4k papers published in Chemie Ingenieur Technik in the last decades have received a total of 67.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Chemie Ingenieur Technik usually cover Mechanical Engineering (3.6k papers), Biomedical Engineering (3.1k papers) and Computational Mechanics (2.3k papers) specifically the topics of Physics and Engineering Research Articles (1.3k papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (901 papers) and Process Optimization and Integration (836 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chemie Ingenieur Technik are Markus Thommes, H. Rumpf, L. Riedel, Alfons Mersmann, E.‐U. Schlünder, Peter Zehner, H.‐P. Wirges, Marko Zlokarnik, B. Cornils and Karl Stephan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chemie Ingenieur Technik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chemie Ingenieur Technik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chemie Ingenieur Technik.

Countries where authors publish in Chemie Ingenieur Technik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chemie Ingenieur Technik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chemie Ingenieur Technik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemie Ingenieur Technik more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025