Claus Goessl

855 total citations
13 papers, 80 citations indexed

About

Claus Goessl is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Claus Goessl has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 80 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 9 papers in Instrumentation and 5 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Claus Goessl's work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (9 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (9 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (5 papers). Claus Goessl is often cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (9 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (9 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (5 papers). Claus Goessl collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Chile. Claus Goessl's co-authors include U. Hopp, R. Bender, A. Riffeser, S. Seitz, J. Koppenhoefer, J. Snigula, Chien‐Hsiu Lee, K. W. Hodapp, W. S. Burgett and N. Kaiser and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astronomical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Claus Goessl

10 papers receiving 75 citations

Peers

Claus Goessl
Jae Sok Oh South Korea
M. Rodenhuis Netherlands
Lindsay Marion United States
C. Diener Germany
A. Coffinet Switzerland
Jae Sok Oh South Korea
Claus Goessl
Citations per year, relative to Claus Goessl Claus Goessl (= 1×) peers Jae Sok Oh

Countries citing papers authored by Claus Goessl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claus Goessl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claus Goessl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claus Goessl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claus Goessl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claus Goessl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claus Goessl. The network helps show where Claus Goessl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claus Goessl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claus Goessl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claus Goessl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claus Goessl. Claus Goessl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Lang-Bardl, Florian, A. Monna, Frank Grupp, et al.. (2022). The MICADO main selection mechanism: final design. 10702. 114–114. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kellermann, H., F. Grupp, Claus Goessl, et al.. (2021). Confirming transiting exoplanets with the Fraunhofer Telescope Wendelstein. 63–63.
3.
Kellermann, H., Liang Wang, Fei Zhao, et al.. (2020). Verification observations of the Manfred Hirt PlanetSpectrograph. 299–299.
4.
Gruen, D., S. Seitz, R. Bender, et al.. (2019). The Wendelstein Weak Lensing (WWL) pathfinder: accurate weak lensing masses for Planck clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 486(1). 77–100. 3 indexed citations
5.
Riffeser, A., S. Seitz, U. Hopp, et al.. (2018). M31 PAndromeda Cepheid Sample Observed in Four HST Bands. The Astrophysical Journal. 864(1). 59–59. 5 indexed citations
6.
Riffeser, A., U. Hopp, Claus Goessl, et al.. (2018). Cepheids in M31: The PAndromeda Cepheid Sample. The Astronomical Journal. 156(3). 130–130. 19 indexed citations
7.
Lang-Bardl, Florian, R. Bender, Claus Goessl, et al.. (2016). The Wendelstein three channel imager (3KK): alignment, commissioning, and first results. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9908. 990844–990844. 5 indexed citations
8.
Riffeser, A., S. Seitz, J. Snigula, et al.. (2015). The M31 Near-Infrared Period-Luminosity Relation and its non-linearity for δ Cep Variables with 0.5 ≤ log(P) ≤ 1.7. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 13 indexed citations
9.
Hopp, U., R. Bender, F. Grupp, et al.. (2014). Commissioning and science verification of the 2m-Fraunhofer Wendelstein Telescope. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9145. 91452D–91452D. 8 indexed citations
10.
Riffeser, A., U. Hopp, S. Seitz, et al.. (2013). PROPERTIES OF M31. II. A CEPHEID DISK SAMPLE DERIVED FROM THE FIRST YEAR OF PS1 PANDROMEDA DATA. The Astronomical Journal. 145(4). 106–106. 18 indexed citations
11.
Hopp, U., R. Bender, Claus Goessl, et al.. (2008). Improving the Wendelstein Observatory for a 2m-class telescope. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7016. 70161T–70161T. 6 indexed citations
12.
Goessl, Claus, Niv Drory, Karl Gebhardt, et al.. (2006). The VIRUS data reduction pipeline. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6270. 627021–627021. 1 indexed citations
13.
Goessl, Claus, et al.. (2003). Two-channel, robotic CCD-camera. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4841. 648–648. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026