James Turner

13.9k total citations
9 papers, 71 citations indexed

About

James Turner is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, James Turner has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 71 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 7 papers in Instrumentation and 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in James Turner's work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (3 papers). James Turner is often cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (3 papers). James Turner collaborates with scholars based in Chile, United Kingdom and United States. James Turner's co-authors include R. L. Davies, M. Schirmer, Robert Content, J. R. Allington‐Smith, Hai Fu, Martin M. Roth, Paul Torrey, Sangeeta Malhotra, E. Mediavilla and Vardha N. Bennert and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, New Astronomy Reviews and Experimental Astronomy.

In The Last Decade

James Turner

9 papers receiving 67 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Turner Chile 6 54 26 16 12 9 9 71
M. M. Roth Germany 5 47 0.9× 24 0.9× 27 1.7× 6 0.5× 3 0.3× 16 75
A. Foster United States 5 69 1.3× 12 0.5× 12 0.8× 12 1.0× 8 0.9× 14 72
Huynh Anh N. Le China 5 82 1.5× 25 1.0× 10 0.6× 16 1.3× 3 0.3× 14 95
Fu-Heng Liang United Kingdom 7 104 1.9× 28 1.1× 11 0.7× 7 0.6× 7 0.8× 16 107
Fabian Scheuermann Australia 5 60 1.1× 24 0.9× 5 0.3× 7 0.6× 5 0.6× 5 71
M. Rodenhuis Netherlands 7 145 2.7× 28 1.1× 10 0.6× 4 0.3× 8 0.9× 9 150
Yiseul Jeon South Korea 6 93 1.7× 35 1.3× 11 0.7× 13 1.1× 3 0.3× 14 101
A. Pécontal France 3 67 1.2× 32 1.2× 9 0.6× 6 0.5× 2 0.2× 13 84
Suk Sien Tie United States 3 81 1.5× 19 0.7× 15 0.9× 13 1.1× 2 0.2× 5 88
Laure Piquéras France 4 52 1.0× 29 1.1× 16 1.0× 8 0.7× 1 0.1× 16 66

Countries citing papers authored by James Turner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Turner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Turner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Turner. The network helps show where James Turner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Turner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Turner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Turner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Turner. James Turner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Schirmer, M., Sangeeta Malhotra, N. A. Levenson, et al.. (2016). About AGN ionization echoes, thermal echoes and ionization deficits in low-redshift Lyα blobs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 463(2). 1554–1586. 18 indexed citations
2.
Davies, R. L., M. Schirmer, & James Turner. (2015). The ‘Green Bean’ Galaxy SDSS J224024.1–092748: unravelling the emission signature of a quasar ionization echo. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 449(2). 1731–1752. 12 indexed citations
3.
Mediavilla, E., Martin M. Roth, James Turner, et al.. (2010). 3D Spectroscopy in Astronomy. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 17 indexed citations
4.
Allington‐Smith, J. R., Marc Dubbeldam, Robert Content, et al.. (2007). New techniques for integral field spectroscopy – II. Performance of the GNIRS IFU. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 376(2). 785–792. 2 indexed citations
5.
Turner, James. (2006). A scientific overview of requirements for IFU data reduction and analysis. New Astronomy Reviews. 50(4-5). 392–397. 1 indexed citations
6.
Turner, James, Bryan W. Miller, Inseok Song, et al.. (2005). Integral Field Spectroscopy with Gemini: Support for IFU data in the Gemini IRAF package. New Astronomy Reviews. 49(10-12). 655–660. 5 indexed citations
7.
Allington‐Smith, J. R., Marc Dubbeldam, Robert Content, et al.. (2004). Integral field spectroscopy with the Gemini Near-Infrared Spectrograph. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5492. 701–701. 6 indexed citations
8.
Allington‐Smith, J. R., Graham J. Murray, Robert Content, et al.. (2002). Integral field spectroscopy with the GEMINI multiobject spectrographs. Experimental Astronomy. 13(1). 1–37. 4 indexed citations
9.
Haynes, Roger, et al.. (1998). SMIRFS-II: multiobject and integral-field near-IR spectroscopy at UKIRT. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3354. 419–419. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026