Claudio Di Sipio
- Information Systems top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Software top 5%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Davide Di RuscioPhuong T. NguyenJuri Di RoccoLinh T. DuongMassimiliano Di PentaAlfonso PierantonioAndrea CapiluppiAntinisca Di Marco
- Topics
- Software Engineering Research (18 papers)Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (9 papers)Web Data Mining and Analysis (6 papers)
- Journals
- Expert Systems with ApplicationsIEEE Transactions on Software EngineeringComputers and Electronics in Agriculture
- Partner nations
- ItalyNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Claudio Di Sipio
35 papers receiving 414 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Information Systems 238
- Artificial Intelligence 151
- Software 89
- Computer Networks and Communications 72
- Plant Science 57
Countries citing papers authored by Claudio Di Sipio
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudio Di Sipio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudio Di Sipio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudio Di Sipio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudio Di Sipio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudio Di Sipio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudio Di Sipio. The network helps show where Claudio Di Sipio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudio Di Sipio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudio Di Sipio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudio Di Sipio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudio Di Sipio. Claudio Di Sipio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 121 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Claudio Di Sipio
Claudio Di Sipio is a scholar working on Software, Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 40 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (18 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (9 papers) and Web Data Mining and Analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (89 citations), Information Systems (238 citations) and Health Informatics (8 citations). Claudio Di Sipio has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Davide Di Ruscio, Phuong T. Nguyen, Juri Di Rocco, Linh T. Duong, Massimiliano Di Penta, Alfonso Pierantonio, Andrea Capiluppi, Antinisca Di Marco, Hugo Brunelière and Diego Clerissi. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering and Computers and Electronics in Agriculture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.