Countries citing papers authored by Cláudia Werner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Cláudia Werner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cláudia Werner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cláudia Werner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cláudia Werner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cláudia Werner. The network helps show where Cláudia Werner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cláudia Werner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cláudia Werner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cláudia Werner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Cláudia Werner. Cláudia Werner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Werner, Cláudia, et al.. (2020). Systematic mapping on the use of games for software engineering education.. Conferencia Iberoamericana de Software Engineering. 512–525.2 indexed citations
3.
Teixeira, Eldânae Nogueira, et al.. (2020). Evaluating the Usefulness and Ease of Use of a Software Process Line Tool.. Conferencia Iberoamericana de Software Engineering. 180–193.1 indexed citations
4.
Werner, Cláudia & Jon Whittle. (2017). Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering and Education Track. International Conference on Software Engineering.6 indexed citations
5.
Oliva, Gustavo A., et al.. (2015). Evolving the System's Core: A Case Study on the Identification and Characterization of Key Developers in Apache Ant. Computing and Informatics / Computers and Artificial Intelligence. 34(3). 678–724.4 indexed citations
6.
Oliveira, Toacy, et al.. (2013). Towards Coupled Evolution of Metamodels, Models, Graph-Based Transformations and Traceability Links (S).. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 747–752.1 indexed citations
7.
Araújo, Renata Mendes de, et al.. (2012). COMPOOTIM: An Approach to Software Processes Composition and Optimization.. Conferencia Iberoamericana de Software Engineering. 42–55.4 indexed citations
8.
Santos, Rodrigo Pereira dos, et al.. (2011). Supporting Software Engineering Education through a Learning Objects and Experience Reports Repository.. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 272–275.4 indexed citations
Murta, Leonardo, et al.. (2008). Odyssey-MEC: Model Evolution Control in the Context of Model-Driven Architecture.. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 67–72.2 indexed citations
12.
Werner, Cláudia, et al.. (2008). Feature Modeling for Context-Aware Software Product Lines.. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 758–763.22 indexed citations
13.
Werner, Cláudia, et al.. (2007). Architectural Elements Recovery and Quality Evaluation to Assist in Reference Architectures Specification.. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 494–499.5 indexed citations
14.
Werner, Cláudia, et al.. (2007). Odyssey-MDA: A Transformational Approach to Component Models.. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 9–14.2 indexed citations
Barros, Márcio de Oliveira, et al.. (2004). A Simulation-Based Game for Project Management Experiential Learning.. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 19–24.36 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.