Claudia Schmalenberg

3.2k total citations
55 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Claudia Schmalenberg is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Claudia Schmalenberg has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in General Health Professions, 21 papers in Research and Theory and 12 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Claudia Schmalenberg's work include Nursing education and management (21 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (13 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (10 papers). Claudia Schmalenberg is often cited by papers focused on Nursing education and management (21 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (13 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (10 papers). Claudia Schmalenberg collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Cyprus. Claudia Schmalenberg's co-authors include Marlene Kramer, Patricia Maguire, Pat Maguire, Barbara B. Brewer, Mary Krugman, Diana Halfer, Karen Cox, Mary Waldo, Cynthia R. King and Christine Lund and has published in prestigious journals such as Nursing Research, Research in Nursing & Health and JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration.

In The Last Decade

Claudia Schmalenberg

54 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Claudia Schmalenberg United States 31 1.8k 1.1k 367 249 241 55 2.4k
Phyllis Giovannetti Canada 18 1.9k 1.1× 815 0.8× 621 1.7× 187 0.8× 204 0.8× 24 2.8k
Donna Sullivan Havens United States 26 1.6k 0.9× 792 0.8× 364 1.0× 172 0.7× 204 0.8× 50 2.4k
Marlene Kramer United States 36 2.6k 1.5× 1.7k 1.6× 532 1.4× 385 1.5× 366 1.5× 93 3.7k
Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne Norway 15 2.2k 1.3× 647 0.6× 452 1.2× 138 0.6× 311 1.3× 39 3.1k
Beth Ulrich United States 21 1.3k 0.8× 777 0.7× 516 1.4× 113 0.5× 224 0.9× 91 2.0k
Linda Flynn United States 27 1.9k 1.1× 703 0.7× 730 2.0× 174 0.7× 296 1.2× 63 3.0k
Maria Kózka Poland 5 1.5k 0.9× 642 0.6× 538 1.5× 171 0.7× 280 1.2× 17 2.3k
Carol S. Brewer United States 25 1.9k 1.1× 907 0.9× 551 1.5× 122 0.5× 185 0.8× 68 2.8k
Rikard Lindqvist Sweden 16 1.5k 0.9× 590 0.6× 417 1.1× 149 0.6× 230 1.0× 27 2.3k
Ada Sue Hinshaw United States 20 1.2k 0.7× 510 0.5× 225 0.6× 243 1.0× 268 1.1× 66 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Claudia Schmalenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Schmalenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Schmalenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Schmalenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia Schmalenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Schmalenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Schmalenberg. The network helps show where Claudia Schmalenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudia Schmalenberg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudia Schmalenberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudia Schmalenberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudia Schmalenberg. Claudia Schmalenberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kramer, Marlene, Barbara B. Brewer, Diana Halfer, et al.. (2017). Impact of Professional Nursing Practices on Patient/Nurse Outcomes. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 47(5). 278–288. 7 indexed citations
2.
Kramer, Marlene, et al.. (2014). The Evolution and Development of an Instrument to Measure Essential Professional Nursing Practices. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 44(11). 569–576. 11 indexed citations
3.
Kaljouw, Marian, et al.. (2013). Measuring the nursing work environment: translation and psychometric evaluation of the Essentials of Magnetism. International Nursing Review. 61(1). 99–108. 24 indexed citations
4.
Kramer, Marlene, Diana Halfer, Pat Maguire, & Claudia Schmalenberg. (2012). Impact of Healthy Work Environments and Multistage Nurse Residency Programs on Retention of Newly Licensed RNs. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 42(3). 148–159. 45 indexed citations
5.
Teasley, Susan L., et al.. (2010). Development and Testing of an Organizational Job Satisfaction Tool. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 41(1). 15–22. 19 indexed citations
6.
Kramer, Marlene, Claudia Schmalenberg, & Patricia Maguire. (2010). Nine Structures and Leadership Practices Essential for a Magnetic (Healthy) Work Environment. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 34(1). 4–17. 67 indexed citations
7.
Kramer, Marlene, et al.. (2009). Incentives and Procedures Effective in Increasing Survey Participation of Professional Nurses in Hospitals. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 33(2). 174–187. 26 indexed citations
8.
Kramer, Marlene, et al.. (2009). Accurate assessment of clinical nurses' work environments: Response rate needed. Research in Nursing & Health. 32(2). 229–240. 59 indexed citations
9.
Kramer, Marlene, Claudia Schmalenberg, & Pat Maguire. (2008). Essentials of a Magnetic work environment. Nursing. &NA;. 23–27. 25 indexed citations
10.
Kramer, Marlene, Patricia Maguire, Claudia Schmalenberg, et al.. (2007). Nurse Manager Support. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 31(4). 325–340. 83 indexed citations
11.
Kramer, Marlene, et al.. (2006). Excellence Through Evidence. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 37(1). 41–52. 52 indexed citations
12.
Kramer, Marlene, Patricia Maguire, & Claudia Schmalenberg. (2006). Excellence Through Evidence. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 36(10). 479–491. 52 indexed citations
13.
Schmalenberg, Claudia, et al.. (2005). Excellence Through Evidence. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 35(11). 507–514. 36 indexed citations
14.
Schmalenberg, Claudia, et al.. (2005). Excellence Through Evidence. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 35(10). 450–458. 69 indexed citations
15.
Kramer, Marlene & Claudia Schmalenberg. (2005). Revising the Essentials of Magnetism Tool. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 35(4). 188???198–188???198. 47 indexed citations
16.
Kramer, Marlene & Claudia Schmalenberg. (2005). Best Quality Patient Care. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 29(3). 275–287. 63 indexed citations
17.
Kramer, Marlene & Claudia Schmalenberg. (2004). Development and Evaluation of Essentials of Magnetism Tool. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 34(7). 365–378. 130 indexed citations
18.
Kramer, Marlene & Claudia Schmalenberg. (2003). Securing “good” nurse/physician relationships. Nursing Management. 34(7). 34–38. 96 indexed citations
19.
Kramer, Marlene & Claudia Schmalenberg. (2003). Magnet hospital staff nurses describe clinical autonomy. Nursing Outlook. 51(1). 13–19. 87 indexed citations
20.
Schmalenberg, Claudia, et al.. (1985). Faculty practice that works: two examples. We call it clinical consultancy.. PubMed. 33(5). 226–8. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026