Marlene Kramer

4.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
93 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Marlene Kramer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory and Issues, ethics and legal aspects. According to data from OpenAlex, Marlene Kramer has authored 93 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in General Health Professions, 28 papers in Research and Theory and 13 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects. Recurrent topics in Marlene Kramer's work include Nursing education and management (28 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (13 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (12 papers). Marlene Kramer is often cited by papers focused on Nursing education and management (28 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (13 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (12 papers). Marlene Kramer collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Marlene Kramer's co-authors include Claudia Schmalenberg, Barbara B. Brewer, Patricia Maguire, Pat Maguire, Mary Krugman, Diana Halfer, Karen Cox, Mary Waldo, Beverly Hoeffer and Bonnie Holaday and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Nursing Studies, Nursing Research and Research in Nursing & Health.

In The Last Decade

Marlene Kramer

90 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

Reality Shock: Why Nurses Leave Nursing 1975 2026 1992 2009 1975 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marlene Kramer United States 36 2.6k 1.7k 532 385 366 93 3.7k
Claudia Schmalenberg United States 31 1.8k 0.7× 1.1k 0.6× 367 0.7× 249 0.6× 241 0.7× 55 2.4k
Christine Kovner United States 34 3.1k 1.2× 1.1k 0.7× 964 1.8× 296 0.8× 410 1.1× 145 4.8k
Julie Sochalski United States 30 3.2k 1.3× 1.3k 0.8× 1.4k 2.7× 317 0.8× 512 1.4× 62 4.8k
Phyllis Giovannetti Canada 18 1.9k 0.7× 815 0.5× 621 1.2× 187 0.5× 204 0.6× 24 2.8k
Mary A. Blegen United States 39 2.2k 0.8× 876 0.5× 1.6k 2.9× 262 0.7× 299 0.8× 71 4.4k
Donna Sullivan Havens United States 26 1.6k 0.6× 792 0.5× 364 0.7× 172 0.4× 204 0.6× 50 2.4k
Patricia Benner United States 2 1.6k 0.6× 991 0.6× 439 0.8× 401 1.0× 929 2.5× 3 3.7k
Linda Flynn United States 27 1.9k 0.8× 703 0.4× 730 1.4× 174 0.5× 296 0.8× 63 3.0k
Ann Kutney‐Lee United States 26 3.1k 1.2× 937 0.6× 751 1.4× 250 0.6× 573 1.6× 58 4.4k
Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne Norway 15 2.2k 0.8× 647 0.4× 452 0.8× 138 0.4× 311 0.8× 39 3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Marlene Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marlene Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlene Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlene Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marlene Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlene Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlene Kramer. The network helps show where Marlene Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marlene Kramer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marlene Kramer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marlene Kramer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marlene Kramer. Marlene Kramer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Halfer, Diana, Barbara B. Brewer, Beth Ulrich, & Marlene Kramer. (2019). A Professional Nursing Acute Care Practice Curriculum. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 49(12). 604–609. 3 indexed citations
2.
Fréchette, Julie, et al.. (2018). Essential Professional Nursing Practices in mental health: A cross‐sectional study of hospital inpatient care. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 27(5). 1490–1500. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kramer, Marlene, Barbara B. Brewer, Diana Halfer, et al.. (2017). Impact of Professional Nursing Practices on Patient/Nurse Outcomes. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 47(5). 278–288. 7 indexed citations
4.
Kramer, Marlene, et al.. (2014). The Evolution and Development of an Instrument to Measure Essential Professional Nursing Practices. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 44(11). 569–576. 11 indexed citations
5.
Kramer, Marlene, et al.. (2012). The Organizational Transformative Power of Nurse Residency Programs. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 36(2). 155–168. 37 indexed citations
6.
Kramer, Marlene, Diana Halfer, Pat Maguire, & Claudia Schmalenberg. (2012). Impact of Healthy Work Environments and Multistage Nurse Residency Programs on Retention of Newly Licensed RNs. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 42(3). 148–159. 45 indexed citations
7.
Kramer, Marlene, Pat Maguire, & Barbara B. Brewer. (2011). Clinical nurses in Magnet hospitals confirm productive, healthy unit work environments. Journal of Nursing Management. 19(1). 5–17. 69 indexed citations
8.
Teasley, Susan L., et al.. (2010). Development and Testing of an Organizational Job Satisfaction Tool. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 41(1). 15–22. 19 indexed citations
9.
Kramer, Marlene, Claudia Schmalenberg, & Patricia Maguire. (2010). Nine Structures and Leadership Practices Essential for a Magnetic (Healthy) Work Environment. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 34(1). 4–17. 67 indexed citations
10.
Kramer, Marlene, et al.. (2009). Incentives and Procedures Effective in Increasing Survey Participation of Professional Nurses in Hospitals. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 33(2). 174–187. 26 indexed citations
11.
Kramer, Marlene, et al.. (2009). Accurate assessment of clinical nurses' work environments: Response rate needed. Research in Nursing & Health. 32(2). 229–240. 59 indexed citations
12.
Kramer, Marlene, Claudia Schmalenberg, & Pat Maguire. (2008). Essentials of a Magnetic work environment. Nursing. &NA;. 23–27. 25 indexed citations
13.
Kramer, Marlene, Patricia Maguire, Claudia Schmalenberg, et al.. (2007). Nurse Manager Support. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 31(4). 325–340. 83 indexed citations
14.
Kramer, Marlene, et al.. (2006). Excellence Through Evidence. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 37(1). 41–52. 52 indexed citations
15.
Schmalenberg, Claudia, et al.. (2005). Excellence Through Evidence. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 35(11). 507–514. 36 indexed citations
16.
Schmalenberg, Claudia, et al.. (2005). Excellence Through Evidence. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 35(10). 450–458. 69 indexed citations
17.
Kramer, Marlene & Claudia Schmalenberg. (2005). Revising the Essentials of Magnetism Tool. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 35(4). 188???198–188???198. 47 indexed citations
18.
Kramer, Marlene & Claudia Schmalenberg. (2004). Development and Evaluation of Essentials of Magnetism Tool. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 34(7). 365–378. 130 indexed citations
19.
Kramer, Marlene & Claudia Schmalenberg. (2003). Securing “good” nurse/physician relationships. Nursing Management. 34(7). 34–38. 96 indexed citations
20.
Hatton, Diane C., et al.. (1993). Effects of a participative intervention on high school students' image and valuation of nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing. 9(1). 41–49. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026