Claudia Niewersch
- Water Science and Technology top 5%
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Mechanical Engineering
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- Thomas MelinC. BlöcherThomas WintgensSüleyman YüceMatthias WeßlingMarkus LenzAndreas SchäfferYannick‐Serge Zimmermann
- Topics
- Membrane Separation Technologies (6 papers)Phosphorus and nutrient management (4 papers)Extraction and Separation Processes (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandSpain
In The Last Decade
Claudia Niewersch
12 papers receiving 413 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Water Science and Technology 259
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 220
- Biomedical Engineering 169
- Mechanical Engineering 107
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 53
Countries citing papers authored by Claudia Niewersch
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Niewersch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Niewersch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Niewersch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia Niewersch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Niewersch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Niewersch. The network helps show where Claudia Niewersch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudia Niewersch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudia Niewersch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudia Niewersch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudia Niewersch. Claudia Niewersch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 67 | |
| 7 | 64 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 145 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | Comparative life cycle assessment study of pretreatment alternatives for RO | 1 |
| 14 | 7 |
About Claudia Niewersch
Claudia Niewersch is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Water Science and Technology and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 14 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Membrane Separation Technologies (6 papers), Phosphorus and nutrient management (4 papers) and Extraction and Separation Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (220 citations), Water Science and Technology (259 citations) and Pollution (51 citations). Claudia Niewersch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Melin, C. Blöcher, Thomas Wintgens, Süleyman Yüce, Matthias Weßling, Markus Lenz, Andreas Schäffer, Yannick‐Serge Zimmermann, Philippe F.-X. Corvini and Christian Schaum. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Water Research and Journal of Membrane Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.