Claudia Grothe
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Biomaterials top 2%
- Co-authors
- Kirsten Haastert‐TaliniKlaus UnsickerGuido NikkhahMarco TimmerStefano GeunaChristina MauritzDörte OttoReiner Westermann
- Topics
- Nerve injury and regeneration (60 papers)Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (31 papers)Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (9 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistrySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- GermanyItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Claudia Grothe
79 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.2k
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Developmental Neuroscience 812
- Surgery 604
- Biomaterials 563
Countries citing papers authored by Claudia Grothe
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Grothe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Grothe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Grothe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia Grothe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Grothe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Grothe. The network helps show where Claudia Grothe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudia Grothe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudia Grothe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudia Grothe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudia Grothe. Claudia Grothe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 47 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | 129 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 84 | |
| 12 | 91 | |
| 13 | 69 | |
| 14 | 134 | |
| 15 | 130 | |
| 16 | 63 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 130 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Claudia Grothe
Claudia Grothe is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomaterials, having authored 79 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (60 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (31 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (812 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.2k citations) and Biomaterials (563 citations). Claudia Grothe has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kirsten Haastert‐Talini, Klaus Unsicker, Guido Nikkhah, Klaus Unsicker, Marco Timmer, Stefano Geuna, Christina Mauritz, Dörte Otto, Reiner Westermann and Andreas Ratzka. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.