Claudia de Rham
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.1%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 0.5%
- Oceanography top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Andrew J. TolleyGregory GabadadzeLavinia HeisenbergScott MelvilleRaquel H. RibeiroDavid PirtskhalavaShuang-Yong ZhouClare Burrage
- Topics
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (84 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (75 papers)Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (19 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaReviews of Modern Physics
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Claudia de Rham
87 papers receiving 6.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 6.2k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 5.7k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.2k
- Oceanography 501
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 325
Countries citing papers authored by Claudia de Rham
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia de Rham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia de Rham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia de Rham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia de Rham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia de Rham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia de Rham. The network helps show where Claudia de Rham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudia de Rham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudia de Rham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudia de Rham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudia de Rham. Claudia de Rham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 46 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | Proca-Nuevo | 2 |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 136 | |
| 14 | Unitary NEC violation in P(X) cosmologies | 1 |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | Resummation of Massive Gravitybreakdown → | 1154 |
| 18 | A manifestly gauge invariant realization of massive gravity | 3 |
| 19 | 97 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Claudia de Rham
Claudia de Rham is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 91 papers that have together received 6.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (84 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (75 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (5.7k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (6.2k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.2k citations). Claudia de Rham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andrew J. Tolley, Gregory Gabadadze, Lavinia Heisenberg, Scott Melville, Raquel H. Ribeiro, David Pirtskhalava, Shuang-Yong Zhou, Clare Burrage, Jun Zhang and A. Matas. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Reviews of Modern Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.