Claudia Borries

1.4k total citations
60 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Claudia Borries is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Claudia Borries has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 32 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 25 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in Claudia Borries's work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (53 papers), GNSS positioning and interference (30 papers) and Earthquake Detection and Analysis (25 papers). Claudia Borries is often cited by papers focused on Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (53 papers), GNSS positioning and interference (30 papers) and Earthquake Detection and Analysis (25 papers). Claudia Borries collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Claudia Borries's co-authors include N. Jakowski, Volker Wilken, Jens Berdermann, Mainul Hoque, Peter Hoffmann, Gerd Teschke, Christoph Jacobi, L. R. Cander, S. M. Stankov and Martin Kriegel and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Claudia Borries

57 papers receiving 986 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Claudia Borries Germany	19	923	511	440	222	178	60	1.0k
A. W. Wernik Poland	17	768 0.8×	310 0.6×	503 1.1×	192 0.9×	223 1.3×	45	948
T. Nygrén Finland	20	976 1.1×	468 0.9×	457 1.0×	249 1.1×	163 0.9×	85	1.1k
Juha Vierinen Norway	21	1.4k 1.6×	637 1.2×	539 1.2×	243 1.1×	215 1.2×	129	1.7k
G. S. Bust United States	20	1.4k 1.5×	744 1.5×	851 1.9×	347 1.6×	315 1.8×	80	1.5k
Xing Meng United States	18	1.2k 1.3×	433 0.8×	141 0.3×	417 1.9×	92 0.5×	56	1.4k
F. Lefeuvre France	25	1.9k 2.0×	1.2k 2.3×	211 0.5×	517 2.3×	61 0.3×	72	2.1k
R. Sheehan United States	26	1.7k 1.9×	643 1.3×	895 2.0×	405 1.8×	295 1.7×	48	1.9k
I. Häggström Sweden	21	1.2k 1.3×	553 1.1×	394 0.9×	232 1.0×	124 0.7×	94	1.4k
Charles S. Carrano United States	23	1.4k 1.5×	584 1.1×	1.1k 2.5×	174 0.8×	494 2.8×	83	1.6k
Yue Deng United States	22	1.9k 2.1×	712 1.4×	357 0.8×	767 3.5×	267 1.5×	101	2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Claudia Borries

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Borries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Borries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Borries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia Borries

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Borries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Borries. The network helps show where Claudia Borries may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudia Borries

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudia Borries. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudia Borries based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudia Borries. Claudia Borries is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Liu, Hanli, Huixin Liu, Gunter Stober, et al.. (2025). High‐Latitude Joule Heating in TIE‐GCM 3.0: Evaluation of Different Plasma Convection Forcing Models. Geophysical Research Letters. 52(17).

Borries, Claudia, et al.. (2024). Persistent high-latitude ionospheric response to solar wind forcing. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate. 14. 33–33. 2 indexed citations

Liu, Huixin, et al.. (2024). Evaluation of the Empirical Scaling Factor of Joule Heating Rates in TIE‐GCM With EISCAT Measurements. Earth and Space Science. 11(4). 1 indexed citations

Tsagouri, Ioanna, Anna Belehaki, David R. Themens, et al.. (2023). Ionosphere variability I: Advances in observational, monitoring and detection capabilities. Advances in Space Research. 7 indexed citations

Tsagouri, Ioanna, David R. Themens, Anna Belehaki, et al.. (2023). Ionosphere variability II: Advances in theory and modeling. Advances in Space Research. 8 indexed citations

Pokhotelov, Dimitry, Gunter Stober, Ingrid Mann, et al.. (2023). Inferring neutral winds in the ionospheric transition region from atmospheric-gravity-wave traveling-ionospheric-disturbance (AGW-TID) observations with the EISCAT VHF radar and the Nordic Meteor Radar Cluster. Annales Geophysicae. 41(2). 409–428. 7 indexed citations

Siemes, Christian, et al.. (2023). New thermosphere neutral mass density and crosswind datasets from CHAMP, GRACE, and GRACE-FO. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate. 13. 16–16. 27 indexed citations

Stober, Gunter, et al.. (2023). Difference spectrum fitting of the ion–neutral collision frequency from dual-frequency EISCAT measurements. Atmospheric measurement techniques. 16(23). 5897–5907. 2 indexed citations

Nykiel, Grzegorz, et al.. (2023). Spatio-Temporal Validation of GNSS-Derived Global Ionosphere Maps Using 16 Years of Jason Satellites Observations. Remote Sensing. 15(20). 5053–5053. 6 indexed citations

10.

Forootan, Ehsan, et al.. (2023). Predicting global thermospheric neutral density during periods with high geomagnetic activity. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 20322–20322. 1 indexed citations

11.

Forootan, Ehsan, et al.. (2021). Using Data Assimilation to Understand the Systematic Errors of CHAMP Accelerometer-Derived Neutral Mass Density Data. elib (German Aerospace Center). 1 indexed citations

12.

Pokhotelov, Dimitry, et al.. (2021). Polar tongue of ionisation during geomagnetic superstorm. Annales Geophysicae. 39(5). 833–847. 8 indexed citations

13.

Belehaki, Anna, Ioanna Tsagouri, David Altadill, et al.. (2020). An overview of methodologies for real-time detection, characterisation and tracking of traveling ionospheric disturbances developed in the TechTIDE project. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate. 10. 42–42. 33 indexed citations

14.

Berdermann, Jens, Martin Kriegel, Frank Heymann, et al.. (2018). Ionospheric Response to the X9.3 Flare on 6 September 2017 and Its Implication for Navigation Services Over Europe. Space Weather. 16(10). 1604–1615. 89 indexed citations

15.

Altadill, David, Anna Belehaki, Estefanía Blanch, et al.. (2018). Report on TID algorithms. QRU Quaderns de Recerca en Urbanisme. 2 indexed citations

16.

Crosby, N. B., Jesse Andries, Andy Devos, et al.. (2017). Services for Space Mission Support Within The ESA Space Situational Awareness Space Weather Service Network. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). 6(1). 1 indexed citations

17.

Borries, Claudia, et al.. (2016). Multiple ionospheric perturbations during the Saint Patrick's Day storm 2015 in the European‐African sector. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 121(11). 48 indexed citations

18.

Berdermann, Jens, N. Jakowski, Mainul Hoque, et al.. (2014). Ionospheric Monitoring and Prediction Center (IMPC). 14–21. 6 indexed citations

19.

Jakowski, N., et al.. (2009). Space Weather Monitoring by Ground and Space Based GNSS Measurements. elib (German Aerospace Center). 729–735. 4 indexed citations

20.

Mayer, C., et al.. (2008). Extreme ionospheric conditions over Europe observed during the last solar cycle. PLoS ONE. 17(8). e0272865–e0272865. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact