Cláudia Bonan

39 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Cláudia Bonan
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • General Health Professions 192
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 112
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 111
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 75
  • Sociology and Political Science 42
Replace Heather Cahill with:
Heather Cahill United Kingdom
Sally Pezaro United Kingdom
Kristen M. Shellenberg United States
Victoria Louise Newton United Kingdom
Emily J. Youatt United States
Andréa Cronemberger Rufino Brazil
Cameryn C. Garrett Australia
Ruşen Öztürk Türkiye
Kristen Lagasse Burke United States
Ümran Sevil Türkiye
Cláudia Bonan relative to Heather Cahill United Kingdom Heather Cahill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Heather Cahill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cláudia Bonan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cláudia Bonan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cláudia Bonan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cláudia Bonan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cláudia Bonan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cláudia Bonan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cláudia Bonan. The network helps show where Cláudia Bonan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cláudia Bonan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cláudia Bonan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cláudia Bonan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cláudia Bonan. Cláudia Bonan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 1
6 0
7 0
8 1
9 1
10 12
11 1
12 2
13 2
14 6
15 15
16
DECIDING THE ROUTE OF DELIVERY IN BRAZIL: THEMES AND TRENDS IN PUBLIC HEALTH PRODUCTION
14
17 6
18
Direitos e saúde reprodutiva: revisitando trajetórias e pensando desafios atuais
1
19 0
20
[Microsurgery and ballistic traumatology of the face].
4

About Cláudia Bonan

Cláudia Bonan is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Obstetrics and Gynecology and General Health Professions, having authored 49 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Sexuality, and Education (13 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (11 papers) and Male Reproductive Health Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (112 citations), General Health Professions (192 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (111 citations). Cláudia Bonan has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Mozambique and France. Frequent co-authors include Kátia Silveira da Silva, Andreza Rodrigues Nakano, Liliane Reis Teixeira, Vânia Matos Fonseca, Luiz Antônio Teixeira, Lizanka Paola Figueiredo Marinheiro, Ana Lúcia Zuma de Rosso, Eloane Gonçalves Ramos, Daniela Berg and Maurice Vincent. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cadernos de Saúde Pública and Ciência & Saúde Coletiva.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026