Clàudia Aymerich
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ana CatalánGonzalo Salazar de PabloPaolo Fusar‐PoliMiguel Ángel González TorresBorja PedruzoPhilip McGuireAnthony J. GiulianoJoaquim Raduà
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (10 papers)COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Clàudia Aymerich
27 papers receiving 484 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Psychiatry and Mental health 233
- Clinical Psychology 207
- General Health Professions 121
- Cognitive Neuroscience 74
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Clàudia Aymerich
This map shows the geographic impact of Clàudia Aymerich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clàudia Aymerich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clàudia Aymerich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clàudia Aymerich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clàudia Aymerich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clàudia Aymerich. The network helps show where Clàudia Aymerich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clàudia Aymerich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clàudia Aymerich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clàudia Aymerich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clàudia Aymerich. Clàudia Aymerich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Clàudia Aymerich
Clàudia Aymerich is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 34 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (10 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (44 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (233 citations) and Clinical Psychology (207 citations). Clàudia Aymerich has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ana Catalán, Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Paolo Fusar‐Poli, Miguel Ángel González Torres, Borja Pedruzo, Philip McGuire, Anthony J. Giuliano, Joaquim Raduà, William S. Stone and Dominic Oliver. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.