C.-J. David Lin

16.1k total citations
83 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

C.-J. David Lin is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Condensed Matter Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, C.-J. David Lin has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 78 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 9 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in C.-J. David Lin's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (77 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (73 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (37 papers). C.-J. David Lin is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (77 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (73 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (37 papers). C.-J. David Lin collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, United Kingdom and United States. C.-J. David Lin's co-authors include William Detmold, Biagio Lucini, Maurizio Piai, Ed Bennett, Davide Vadacchino, Deog Ki Hong, Jong-Wan Lee, Stefan Meinel, G. Martinelli and Daniel Arndt and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nuclear Physics B.

In The Last Decade

C.-J. David Lin

74 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C.-J. David Lin Taiwan 20 1.1k 50 46 34 20 83 1.1k
Davide Vadacchino United Kingdom 14 490 0.5× 44 0.9× 55 1.2× 45 1.3× 28 1.4× 52 557
M. Talevi United Kingdom 12 765 0.7× 89 1.8× 35 0.8× 38 1.1× 40 2.0× 16 791
M. Savcı Türkiye 25 1.7k 1.6× 24 0.5× 38 0.8× 41 1.2× 10 0.5× 131 1.7k
Andreas Athenodorou Cyprus 14 546 0.5× 46 0.9× 57 1.2× 68 2.0× 28 1.4× 45 593
A. Ya. Parkhomenko Russia 12 460 0.4× 73 1.5× 36 0.8× 14 0.4× 58 2.9× 37 475
Daisuke Kadoh Japan 10 684 0.6× 44 0.9× 104 2.3× 90 2.6× 45 2.3× 36 735
N. G. Stefanis Germany 17 933 0.9× 25 0.5× 26 0.6× 24 0.7× 14 0.7× 37 953
Georg Bergner Germany 13 543 0.5× 54 1.1× 69 1.5× 72 2.1× 59 3.0× 76 574
Th. Feldmann Germany 17 2.0k 1.9× 32 0.6× 32 0.7× 12 0.4× 8 0.4× 21 2.0k
A. C. Aguilar Brazil 27 1.9k 1.7× 35 0.7× 38 0.8× 31 0.9× 22 1.1× 55 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by C.-J. David Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.-J. David Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.-J. David Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.-J. David Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.-J. David Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.-J. David Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.-J. David Lin. The network helps show where C.-J. David Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.-J. David Lin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.-J. David Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.-J. David Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.-J. David Lin. C.-J. David Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jansen, Karl, et al.. (2025). Progress in lattice simulations for two Higgs doublet models. Proceedings Of Science. 145–145.
2.
Bennett, Ed, Deog Ki Hong, Jong-Wan Lee, et al.. (2024). Progress on the spectroscopy of an Sp(4) gauge theory coupled to matter in multiple representations. Proceedings Of Science. 139–139. 1 indexed citations
3.
Bennett, Ed, Deog Ki Hong, Jong-Wan Lee, et al.. (2024). Mixing between flavor singlets in lattice gauge theories coupled to matter fields in multiple representations. Physical review. D. 110(7). 6 indexed citations
4.
Sarkar, Mugdha, et al.. (2023). Study of SU(2) gauge theories with multiple Higgs fields in different representations. Proceedings of The 39th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2022). 388–388. 2 indexed citations
5.
Bennett, Ed, Peter Boyle, Jong-Wan Lee, et al.. (2023). Lattice studies of Sp(2N) gauge theories using GRID. PEARL (University of Plymouth). 97–97. 1 indexed citations
6.
Jansen, Karl, et al.. (2023). Lattice investigation of the general Two Higgs Doublet Model with SU(2) gauge fields. Proceedings Of Science. 87–87. 1 indexed citations
7.
Sarkar, Mugdha, et al.. (2023). Study of 3-dimensional SU(2) gauge theory with adjoint Higgs as a model for cuprate superconductors. Proceedings Of Science. 362–362. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bennett, Ed, Deog Ki Hong, Jong-Wan Lee, et al.. (2023). Spectroscopy of chimera baryons in a Sp(4) lattice gauge theory. Proceedings of The 39th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2022). 211–211. 8 indexed citations
9.
Bennett, Ed, Peter A. Boyle, Luigi Del Debbio, et al.. (2023). Symplectic lattice gauge theories in the grid framework: Approaching the conformal window. Physical review. D. 108(9). 11 indexed citations
10.
Lucini, Biagio, Ed Bennett, Deog Ki Hong, et al.. (2022). Sp(4) gauge theories and beyond the standard model physics. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17 indexed citations
11.
Perry, Robert, et al.. (2022). Progress in the determination of Mellin moments of the pion LCDA using the HOPE method. Proceedings of The 38th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2021). 488–488. 1 indexed citations
12.
Perry, Robert, et al.. (2022). Progress in calculation of the fourth Mellin moment of the pion light-cone distribution amplitude using the HOPE method. Proceedings of The 39th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2022). 119–119. 1 indexed citations
14.
Detmold, William, et al.. (2021). Parton physics from a heavy-quark operator product expansion: Formalism and Wilson coefficients. Physical review. D. 104(7). 30 indexed citations
15.
Bañuls, Mari Carmen, et al.. (2018). Tensor Network study of the (1+1)-dimensional Thirring Model. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5 indexed citations
16.
Bennett, Ed, Deog Ki Hong, Jong-Wan Lee, et al.. (2018). Higgs compositeness in Sp(2N) gauge theories — The pure gauge model. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 6 indexed citations
17.
Jansen, Karl, et al.. (2018). Higgs-Yukawa model on the lattice. DESY Publication Database (PUBDB) (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron). 2 indexed citations
18.
Bennett, Ed, Deog Ki Hong, Jong-Wan Lee, et al.. (2018). Higgs compositeness in Sp(2N) gauge theories – Determining the low-energy constants with lattice calculations. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 9 indexed citations
19.
Athenodorou, Andreas, Ed Bennett, Georg Bergner, et al.. (2016). Large mass hierarchies from strongly-coupled dynamics. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2016(6). 22 indexed citations
20.
Lin, C.-J. David, G. Martinelli, Elisabetta Pallante, C.T. Sachrajda, & Giovanni Villadoro. (2002). $K^{+}\\to\\pi^{+}\\pi^{0}$ decays at next-to-leading order in the chiral expansion on finite volumes. ArXiv.org. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026