Cindy Hooker
About
In The Last Decade
Cindy Hooker
11 papers receiving 345 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- General Health Professions 240
- Applied Psychology 152
- Physiology 145
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 101
- Clinical Psychology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Cindy Hooker
This map shows the geographic impact of Cindy Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cindy Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cindy Hooker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cindy Hooker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cindy Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cindy Hooker. The network helps show where Cindy Hooker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cindy Hooker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cindy Hooker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cindy Hooker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cindy Hooker. Cindy Hooker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 122 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 40 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 33 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.