Ciao‐Wei Chen
Impact in
- Accounting top 5%
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
Papers in
- Accounting 11
- Corporate Finance and Governance 9
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 8
- Corporate Taxation and Avoidance 3
-
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research 8
- Corporate Governance and Law 1
- Co-authors
- Richard Mergenthaler (5 shared papers)Todd D. Kravet (2 shared papers)Daniel W. Collins (3 shared papers)Maria Correia (2 shared papers)Oktay Urcan (2 shared papers)Laura Yue Li (1 shared paper)Phillip J. Quinn (1 shared paper)Ryan J. Wilson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Contemporary Accounting Research (2 papers)The Accounting Review (2 papers)Review of Accounting Studies (1 paper)Journal of Accounting Research (1 paper)SSRN Electronic Journal (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ciao‐Wei Chen
10 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Accounting 276
- Strategy and Management 148
- Finance 95
- Management Information Systems 32
- Economics and Econometrics 23
Countries citing papers authored by Ciao‐Wei Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Ciao‐Wei Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ciao‐Wei Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ciao‐Wei Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ciao‐Wei Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ciao‐Wei Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ciao‐Wei Chen. The network helps show where Ciao‐Wei Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Ciao‐Wei Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 200 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 0 |
About Ciao‐Wei Chen
Ciao‐Wei Chen is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management, Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 12 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (8 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (3 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (1 paper), Taxation and Compliance Studies (1 paper) and Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (276 citations), Strategy and Management (148 citations), Finance (95 citations), Management Information Systems (32 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (23 citations). Ciao‐Wei Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard Mergenthaler, Todd D. Kravet, Daniel W. Collins, Maria Correia, Oktay Urcan, Laura Yue Li, Phillip J. Quinn, Ryan J. Wilson and Frank Heflin. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Accounting Research, The Accounting Review, Review of Accounting Studies, Journal of Accounting Research and SSRN Electronic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.