Ciao‐Wei Chen

491 total citations
12 papers, 306 citations indexed

About

Ciao‐Wei Chen is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Ciao‐Wei Chen has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 306 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Accounting, 9 papers in Strategy and Management and 2 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Ciao‐Wei Chen's work include Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (8 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers). Ciao‐Wei Chen is often cited by papers focused on Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (8 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers). Ciao‐Wei Chen collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Ciao‐Wei Chen's co-authors include Richard Mergenthaler, Daniel W. Collins, Todd D. Kravet, Oktay Urcan, Maria Correia, Laura Yue Li, Ryan J. Wilson, Phillip J. Quinn and Frank Heflin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Accounting Research, The Accounting Review and Contemporary Accounting Research.

In The Last Decade

Ciao‐Wei Chen

10 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ciao‐Wei Chen United States 5 276 148 95 32 23 12 306
Edith Leung Netherlands 7 229 0.8× 136 0.9× 75 0.8× 34 1.1× 26 1.1× 12 263
George W. Ruch United States 5 271 1.0× 132 0.9× 60 0.6× 30 0.9× 29 1.3× 10 300
Scott N. Bronson United States 6 456 1.7× 192 1.3× 104 1.1× 65 2.0× 25 1.1× 7 479
Erick Rading Outa Kenya 8 271 1.0× 130 0.9× 109 1.1× 34 1.1× 46 2.0× 13 311
Paul Tanyi United States 9 345 1.3× 136 0.9× 51 0.5× 49 1.5× 20 0.9× 21 371
Nathalie Gonthier‐Besacier France 6 279 1.0× 119 0.8× 40 0.4× 50 1.6× 15 0.7× 13 313
Maria Vulcheva United States 8 365 1.3× 127 0.9× 95 1.0× 53 1.7× 31 1.3× 23 388
Ben‐Hsien Bao Hong Kong 8 331 1.2× 239 1.6× 120 1.3× 28 0.9× 29 1.3× 14 373
Caitlin M. S. Ruddock Australia 6 429 1.6× 191 1.3× 88 0.9× 56 1.8× 33 1.4× 7 446
Robert H. Herz Belgium 11 254 0.9× 162 1.1× 59 0.6× 57 1.8× 34 1.5× 22 287

Countries citing papers authored by Ciao‐Wei Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ciao‐Wei Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ciao‐Wei Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ciao‐Wei Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ciao‐Wei Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ciao‐Wei Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ciao‐Wei Chen. The network helps show where Ciao‐Wei Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ciao‐Wei Chen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ciao‐Wei Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ciao‐Wei Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ciao‐Wei Chen. Ciao‐Wei Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Chen, Ciao‐Wei, et al.. (2025). Right on target: Is public disclosure of non‐GAAP earnings associated with M&A efficiency?. Contemporary Accounting Research. 42(3). 2122–2155. 1 indexed citations
2.
Chen, Ciao‐Wei, et al.. (2025). Measuring Cash Flows: A Guide for Researchers. The Accounting Review. 100(6). 61–86.
3.
Chen, Ciao‐Wei & Laura Yue Li. (2023). Is hiring fast a good sign? The informativeness of job vacancy duration for future firm profitability. Review of Accounting Studies. 28(3). 1316–1353. 3 indexed citations
4.
Chen, Ciao‐Wei, Maria Correia, & Oktay Urcan. (2022). Accounting for Leases and Corporate Investment. The Accounting Review. 98(3). 109–133. 13 indexed citations
5.
Chen, Ciao‐Wei, et al.. (2022). Public Peer Firm Information in Mergers and Acquisitions of Privately Held Targets. SSRN Electronic Journal.
6.
Chen, Ciao‐Wei. (2019). The Disciplinary Role of Financial Statements: Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions of Privately Held Targets. Journal of Accounting Research. 57(2). 391–430. 35 indexed citations
7.
Chen, Ciao‐Wei, Maria Correia, & Oktay Urcan. (2018). Real Effects of Accounting for Leases. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
8.
9.
Chen, Ciao‐Wei, Daniel W. Collins, Todd D. Kravet, & Richard Mergenthaler. (2017). Financial Statement Comparability and the Efficiency of Acquisition Decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research. 35(1). 164–202. 200 indexed citations
10.
Chen, Ciao‐Wei, et al.. (2017). Revisiting Measurement Error in Surrogate Measures of Operating Cash Flows: Have We Solved the Problem?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
11.
Chen, Ciao‐Wei, et al.. (2014). Tax-Motivated Income Shifting and the Information Environment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
12.
Chen, Ciao‐Wei, Daniel W. Collins, Todd D. Kravet, & Richard Mergenthaler. (2012). Financial Statement Comparability and the Efficiency of Acquisition Decisions. SSRN Electronic Journal. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026