Chwee Tat Koe
About
In The Last Decade
Chwee Tat Koe
9 papers receiving 217 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Molecular Biology 190
- Cell Biology 78
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 66
- Plant Science 42
- Developmental Neuroscience 24
Countries citing papers authored by Chwee Tat Koe
This map shows the geographic impact of Chwee Tat Koe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chwee Tat Koe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chwee Tat Koe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chwee Tat Koe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chwee Tat Koe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chwee Tat Koe. The network helps show where Chwee Tat Koe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chwee Tat Koe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chwee Tat Koe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chwee Tat Koe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chwee Tat Koe. Chwee Tat Koe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 51 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.