Chung‐Wah Wu
About
In The Last Decade
Chung‐Wah Wu
12 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Molecular Biology 350
- Cancer Research 231
- Epidemiology 91
- Oncology 49
- Hepatology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Chung‐Wah Wu
This map shows the geographic impact of Chung‐Wah Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chung‐Wah Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chung‐Wah Wu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chung‐Wah Wu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chung‐Wah Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chung‐Wah Wu. The network helps show where Chung‐Wah Wu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chung‐Wah Wu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chung‐Wah Wu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chung‐Wah Wu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chung‐Wah Wu. Chung‐Wah Wu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 92 | |
| 2 | 79 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 69 | |
| 10 | 102 | |
| 11 | 67 | |
| 12 | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.