Chung Ho Ko
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 10%
- Food Science
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Co-authors
- Byoung Ryong JeongPrabhakaran SoundararajanAbinaya ManivannanNur HalimahSowbiya MuneerHao WeiYuze ChenSeung Youn Lee
- Topics
- Ecology and Conservation Studies (9 papers)Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (8 papers)Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaIndonesiaTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Chung Ho Ko
20 papers receiving 479 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Plant Science 454
- Molecular Biology 171
- Geochemistry and Petrology 48
- Food Science 32
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 27
Countries citing papers authored by Chung Ho Ko
This map shows the geographic impact of Chung Ho Ko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chung Ho Ko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chung Ho Ko more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chung Ho Ko
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chung Ho Ko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chung Ho Ko. The network helps show where Chung Ho Ko may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chung Ho Ko
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chung Ho Ko. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chung Ho Ko based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chung Ho Ko. Chung Ho Ko is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 213 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | Direct Adventitious Shoot Regeneration from Cotyledonary Explants of Jeffersonia dubia Benth et. Hook | 2 |
| 20 | Use of Pellet and Cube Type Phenolic Foam as the Medium for Production of Plug Seedlings of ‘Fascinato’ Paprika | 1 |
About Chung Ho Ko
Chung Ho Ko is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Cell Biology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Conservation Studies (9 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (8 papers) and Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (454 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (48 citations) and Molecular Biology (171 citations). Chung Ho Ko has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Indonesia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Byoung Ryong Jeong, Prabhakaran Soundararajan, Abinaya Manivannan, Nur Halimah, Sowbiya Muneer, Hao Wei, Yuze Chen, Seung Youn Lee, Yoo Gyeong Park and Hye Jin Oh. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and BioMed Research International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.