Christopher W. Bishop

459 citations
13 papers · 355 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher W. Bishop

12 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers

Christopher W. Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 312
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 169
  • Sensory Systems 50
  • Speech and Hearing 31
  • Developmental Biology 10
Replace Jonathan H. Venezia with:
Jonathan H. Venezia United States
Nadine Hauthal Germany
Nelli H. Salminen Finland
Julia Erb Germany
Tara Vongpaisal Canada
Sophie Savel France
Kate McClannahan United States
Lorin Lachs United States
Krista L. Johnson United States
Christine K. Koh United States
Christopher W. Bishop relative to Jonathan H. Venezia United States Jonathan H. Venezia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jonathan H. Venezia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher W. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher W. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher W. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher W. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher W. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher W. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher W. Bishop. The network helps show where Christopher W. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Christopher W. Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher W. Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Christopher W. Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2008102
2 200884
3 201170
4 201131
5 201216
6 201713
7 201113
8 201111
9 20128
10 20124
11 20232
12 20141
13
Targeting Observations to Reduce Acoustic Prediction Uncertainty
20100

About Christopher W. Bishop

Christopher W. Bishop is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Genetics and Social Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Color perception and design (1 paper), Seismic Waves and Analysis (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (312 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (169 citations), Sensory Systems (50 citations), Speech and Hearing (31 citations) and Developmental Biology (10 citations). Christopher W. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Lee M. Miller, Antoine J. Shahin, Tom Campbell, Jess R. Kerlin, Deepak Kumar Yadav, Ruth A. Bentler, Yu-Hsiang Wu, Kelly L. Tremblay, Ellen S. Hong and Justin D. Lathia. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Current Biology, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Neuro-Oncology Advances and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact