Tom Campbell

562 total citations
32 papers, 433 citations indexed

About

Tom Campbell is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Ocean Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Campbell has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 433 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Ocean Engineering. Recurrent topics in Tom Campbell's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (15 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (12 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). Tom Campbell is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (15 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (12 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). Tom Campbell collaborates with scholars based in Finland, United States and United Kingdom. Tom Campbell's co-authors include István Winkler, Teija Kujala, C. Philip Beaman, Dianne C. Berry, John E. Marsh, Christopher W. Bishop, Lee M. Miller, Jess R. Kerlin, Jun Kong and Risto Näätänen and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Trends in Cognitive Sciences and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Tom Campbell

28 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tom Campbell Finland	11	357	109	44	39	37	32	433
Janet M. Weisenberger United States	12	297 0.8×	155 1.4×	34 0.8×	22 0.6×	46 1.2×	37	394
Luz María Alonso-Valerdi Mexico	11	217 0.6×	43 0.4×	23 0.5×	24 0.6×	20 0.5×	53	348
Ronny Hannemann Germany	13	348 1.0×	90 0.8×	61 1.4×	47 1.2×	21 0.6×	39	453
Ayoub Daliri United States	18	482 1.4×	352 3.2×	17 0.4×	42 1.1×	46 1.2×	43	705
Clara Suied France	13	256 0.7×	154 1.4×	37 0.8×	67 1.7×	92 2.5×	25	404
Olivier Warusfel France	12	258 0.7×	72 0.7×	51 1.2×	118 3.0×	43 1.2×	45	369
Eve Wilson United Kingdom	10	442 1.2×	171 1.6×	39 0.9×	20 0.5×	29 0.8×	28	546
Santani Teng United States	8	373 1.0×	140 1.3×	15 0.3×	6 0.2×	23 0.6×	19	434
Jess R. Kerlin United States	9	543 1.5×	164 1.5×	26 0.6×	57 1.5×	83 2.2×	13	605
Kim S. Abouchacra United States	7	357 1.0×	100 0.9×	173 3.9×	109 2.8×	28 0.8×	23	436

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Campbell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Campbell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Campbell. The network helps show where Tom Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Campbell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Campbell. Tom Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Smith, James, Tom Campbell, J. B. Clark, et al.. (2025). A phenotypic screen for novel small molecules that correct tau‐mediated pathologies in human frontotemporal dementia neurons. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 21(9). e70620–e70620.

Campbell, Tom, et al.. (2024). Binaural interaction in human auditory brainstem and middle-latency responses affected by sound frequency band, lateralization predictability, and attended modality. Hearing Research. 452. 109089–109089.

Beaman, C. Philip, Tom Campbell, & John E. Marsh. (2021). How much do we orient? A systematic approach to auditory distraction.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 47(7). 1054–1066. 3 indexed citations

Marsh, John E., Tom Campbell, François Vachon, Paul J. Taylor, & Robert W. Hughes. (2019). How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 82(1). 350–362. 28 indexed citations

Campbell, Tom & John E. Marsh. (2019). On corticopetal–corticofugal loops of the new early filter. Neuroreport. 30(3). 202–206. 1 indexed citations

Campbell, Tom, et al.. (2017). Spelling With a Small Mobile Brain-Computer Interface in a Moving Wheelchair. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 25(11). 2169–2179. 15 indexed citations

Marsh, John E. & Tom Campbell. (2016). Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 10. 136–136. 23 indexed citations

Marsh, John E., et al.. (2015). Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 548–548. 11 indexed citations

Campbell, Tom. (2015). A theory of attentional modulations of the supratemporal generation of the auditory mismatch negativity (MMN). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. 1065–1065. 3 indexed citations

10.

Sysoeva, Olga, Elke B. Lange, Alexander Sorokin, & Tom Campbell. (2014). From pre-attentive processes to durable representation: An ERP index of visual distraction. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 95(3). 310–321. 9 indexed citations

11.

Campbell, Tom, et al.. (2013). The zigzag paradigm. 205–212. 6 indexed citations

12.

Campbell, Tom, et al.. (2012). Indoor Navigation Using a Mobile Phone. 109–115. 8 indexed citations

13.

Campbell, Tom, Jess R. Kerlin, Christopher W. Bishop, & Lee M. Miller. (2011). Methods to Eliminate Stimulus Transduction Artifact From Insert Earphones During Electroencephalography. Ear and Hearing. 33(1). 144–150. 70 indexed citations

14.

Campbell, Tom, István Winkler, & Teija Kujala. (2007). N1 and the mismatch negativity are spatiotemporally distinct ERP components: Disruption of immediate memory by auditory distraction can be related to N1. Psychophysiology. 44(4). 530–540. 45 indexed citations

15.

Campbell, Tom & Tuomas Neuvonen. (2007). Adaptation of neuromagnetic N1 without shifts in dipolar orientation. Neuroreport. 18(4). 377–380. 4 indexed citations

16.

Campbell, Tom, István Winkler, & Teija Kujala. (2005). Disruption of immediate memory and brain processes: an auditory ERP protocol. Brain Research Protocols. 14(2). 77–86. 9 indexed citations

17.

Campbell, Tom. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of auditory distraction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9(1). 3–5. 24 indexed citations

18.

Campbell, Tom, István Winkler, Teija Kujala, & Risto Näätänen. (2003). The N1 hypothesis and irrelevant sound: evidence from token set size effects. Cognitive Brain Research. 18(1). 39–47. 32 indexed citations

19.

Campbell, Tom, C. Philip Beaman, & Dianne C. Berry. (2002). Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption. Memory. 10(3). 199–214. 63 indexed citations

20.

Campbell, Tom & R. C. Bachman. (1987). Polymer-Augmented Waterflood In The Rapdan Upper Shaunavon Unit. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. 26(4). 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact