Christopher T. Whelan
About
In The Last Decade
Christopher T. Whelan
145 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Sociology and Political Science 2.3k
- General Health Professions 1.5k
- Political Science and International Relations 985
- Health 733
- Economics and Econometrics 551
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher T. Whelan
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher T. Whelan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher T. Whelan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher T. Whelan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher T. Whelan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher T. Whelan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher T. Whelan. The network helps show where Christopher T. Whelan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher T. Whelan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher T. Whelan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher T. Whelan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher T. Whelan. Christopher T. Whelan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | From Income Poverty to Multidimensional Quality of Life | 4 |
| 3 | Non-monetary indicators and multiple dimensions: the ESRI approach to poverty measurement | 2 |
| 4 | Socio-Economic Variation in the Impact of the Irish Recession on the Experience of Economic Stress among Families | 7 |
| 5 | Economic stress and the Great Recession in Ireland: The erosion of social class advantage | 3 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | GINI Country Report: Growing Inequalities and their Impacts in Ireland | 1 |
| 8 | Identifying Childhood Deprivation: How Well do National Indicators of Poverty and Social Exclusion in Ireland Perform? | 13 |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | Multiple Deprivation and Multiple Disadvantage in Ireland: An Analysis of EU-SILC | 14 |
| 11 | Economic Change, Social Mobility and Meritocracy: Reflections on the Irish Experience | 4 |
| 12 | Reassessing Income and Deprivation Approaches to the Measurement of Poverty in Ireland | 15 |
| 13 | Class inequalities in educational attainment among the adult population in the Republic of Ireland | 21 |
| 14 | A Review of the Commission on Social Welfare's Minimum Adequate Income | 1 |
| 15 | Poverty in the 1990s: evidence from the 1994 Living in Ireland Survey. | 35 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | The Role of Sense of Control and Social Support in Mediating the Impact of Psychological Distress: a Test of the Hypothesis of Functional Substitution | 3 |
| 18 | The Impact of Realistic and Illusory Control on Psychological Distress: A Test of the Model of Instrumental Realism | 5 |
| 19 | The Development of an Irish Census Based Social Class Scale | 48 |
| 20 | Employment Conditions and Job Satisfaction: The Distribution, Perception and Evaluation of Job Rewards | 4 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.