Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets
20081.3k citationsDevah Pager, Hana Shepherdprofile →
Discrimination in a Low-Wage Labor Market
2009700 citationsDevah Pager, Bart Bonikowski et al.American Sociological Reviewprofile →
Black Neighbors, Higher Crime? The Role of Racial Stereotypes in Evaluations of Neighborhood Crime
2001514 citationsLincoln Quillian, Devah PagerAmerican Journal of Sociologyprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Devah Pager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Devah Pager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Devah Pager more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Devah Pager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Devah Pager. The network helps show where Devah Pager may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Devah Pager
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Devah Pager.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Devah Pager based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Devah Pager. Devah Pager is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Quillian, Lincoln, et al.. (2019). Do Some Countries Discriminate More than Others? Evidence from 97 Field Experiments of Racial Discrimination in Hiring. Sociological Science. 6. 467–496.167 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Quillian, Lincoln, et al.. (2017). Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(41). 10870–10875.470 indexed citations breakdown →
Phelps, Michelle S. & Devah Pager. (2015). Inequality and Punishment. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 663(1). 185–203.48 indexed citations
Pager, Devah & David S. Pedulla. (2011). Race, Self-Selection, and the Job Search Process: A Case Study of the Unemployed in New Jersey.1 indexed citations
10.
Pager, Devah, Bruce Western, & David S. Pedulla. (2009). Employment Discrimination and the Changing Landscape of Low-Wage Labor Markets. The University of Chicago legal forum. 2009(1). 9.4 indexed citations
11.
Pager, Devah, Bart Bonikowski, & Bruce Western. (2009). Discrimination in a Low-Wage Labor Market. American Sociological Review. 74(5). 777–799.700 indexed citations breakdown →
Pager, Devah & Hana Shepherd. (2008). The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets. PubMed Central.5 indexed citations
Pager, Devah & Bruce Western. (2005). Discrimination in Low-Wage Labor Markets: Results from an Experimental Audit Study in New York City. 1–17.4 indexed citations
Quillian, Lincoln & Devah Pager. (2001). Black Neighbors, Higher Crime? The Role of Racial Stereotypes in Evaluations of Neighborhood Crime. American Journal of Sociology. 107(3). 717–767.514 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.