Christopher Stout
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Communication
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Leah RuppannerKatherine TateReuben KlineMeghan WilsonPaul J. MartinGosia MikołajczakKeith BakerNatalie Masuoka
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (22 papers)Gender Politics and Representation (16 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIreland
In The Last Decade
Christopher Stout
30 papers receiving 222 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Sociology and Political Science 150
- Political Science and International Relations 126
- Gender Studies 100
- Communication 31
- Social Psychology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Stout
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Stout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Stout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Stout more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Stout
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Stout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Stout. The network helps show where Christopher Stout may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Stout
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Stout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Stout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Stout. Christopher Stout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | Ashamed Not to Vote for an African-American; Ashamed to Vote for a Woman: An Analysis of the Bradley Effect from 1982-2006 | 5 |
| 20 | The Changing Non-Voter: What Differentiates Non-Voters and Voters in Asian American and Latino Communities? | 3 |
About Christopher Stout
Christopher Stout is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (22 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (16 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (100 citations), Political Science and International Relations (126 citations) and Communication (31 citations). Christopher Stout has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Leah Ruppanner, Katherine Tate, Reuben Kline, Meghan Wilson, Paul J. Martin, Gosia Mikołajczak, Keith Baker, Natalie Masuoka, Mark Edwards and Louis DeSipio. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Public Opinion Quarterly and Gender & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.