Christopher Power

1.4k total citations
39 papers, 650 citations indexed

About

Christopher Power is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher Power has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 650 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 11 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics and 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Christopher Power's work include Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (11 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (8 papers) and Usability and User Interface Design (8 papers). Christopher Power is often cited by papers focused on Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (11 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (8 papers) and Usability and User Interface Design (8 papers). Christopher Power collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Malaysia. Christopher Power's co-authors include Helen Petrie, André Pimenta Freire, David Swallow, Paul Cairns, Mohd Kamal Othman, Helmut Jürgensen, Richard F. Paige, Alena Denisova, Gøran K. Olsen and Steffen Zschaler and has published in prestigious journals such as Safety Science, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies and International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction.

In The Last Decade

Christopher Power

36 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Christopher Power United Kingdom 12 314 183 162 116 85 39 650
Mireia Ribera Spain 11 302 1.0× 102 0.6× 80 0.5× 104 0.9× 60 0.7× 59 675
Carlos Duarte Portugal 14 179 0.6× 105 0.6× 164 1.0× 56 0.5× 110 1.3× 72 643
Patricia Acosta-Vargas Ecuador 15 237 0.8× 78 0.4× 61 0.4× 73 0.6× 49 0.6× 72 741
Mike Wald United Kingdom 14 79 0.3× 116 0.6× 98 0.6× 64 0.6× 99 1.2× 92 880
Mary Zajicek United Kingdom 12 123 0.4× 98 0.5× 233 1.4× 77 0.7× 60 0.7× 35 668
John Arnott United Kingdom 12 74 0.2× 84 0.5× 245 1.5× 107 0.9× 83 1.0× 20 568
Yu Zhong United States 12 181 0.6× 313 1.7× 185 1.1× 43 0.4× 57 0.7× 24 804
Rock Leung Canada 14 34 0.1× 100 0.5× 242 1.5× 49 0.4× 61 0.7× 28 632
Salvador Otón Spain 12 94 0.3× 47 0.3× 46 0.3× 22 0.2× 62 0.7× 64 505
Daniela Quiñones Chile 7 26 0.1× 122 0.7× 155 1.0× 37 0.3× 41 0.5× 23 456

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Power

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Power's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Power with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Power more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Power

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Power. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Power. The network helps show where Christopher Power may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Power

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Power. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Power based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Power. Christopher Power is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Power, Christopher, et al.. (2021). Validation and Prioritization of Design Options for Accessible Player Experiences. Interacting with Computers. 33(6). 641–656. 5 indexed citations
3.
Power, Christopher. (2020). Creating Accessible Player Experiences in Digital Games. 7–7.
4.
Cairns, Paul, et al.. (2019). Enabled Players: The Value of Accessible Digital Games. Games and Culture. 16(2). 262–282. 47 indexed citations
5.
Cairns, Paul, et al.. (2019). Future design of accessibility in games: A design vocabulary. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 131. 64–71. 32 indexed citations
6.
Holloway, Catherine, Kathrin Gerling, Christopher Power, et al.. (2019). Disability Interactions in Digital Games. Lirias (KU Leuven). 835–839. 7 indexed citations
7.
Lane, Matthew, et al.. (2019). Establishing and quantifying the causal linkage between drainage and earthworks performance for Highways England. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology. 53(2). 333–338. 1 indexed citations
8.
Power, Christopher, et al.. (2018). Lost at the Edge of Uncertainty: Measuring Player Uncertainty in Digital Games. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 35(12). 1033–1045. 22 indexed citations
9.
Power, Christopher, Andrew Lewis, Helen Petrie, et al.. (2017). Improving Archaeologists’ Online Archive Experiences Through User-Centred Design. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage. 10(1). 1–20. 10 indexed citations
10.
Power, Christopher, et al.. (2017). Measuring Uncertainty in Games. City Research Online (City University London). 2839–2845. 7 indexed citations
11.
Eramian, Mark, Ekta Walia, Christopher Power, Paul Cairns, & Andrew Lewis. (2016). Image-based search and retrieval for biface artefacts using features capturing archaeologically significant characteristics. Machine Vision and Applications. 28(1-2). 201–218. 4 indexed citations
12.
Swallow, David, Helen Petrie, & Christopher Power. (2016). Understanding and Supporting Web Developers: Design and Evaluation of a Web Accessibility Information Resource (WebAIR). Studies in health technology and informatics. 229. 482–91. 4 indexed citations
13.
Petrie, Helen, et al.. (2015). Towards a unified definition of web accessibility. 1–13. 44 indexed citations
14.
Othman, Mohd Kamal, Helen Petrie, & Christopher Power. (2013). Measuring the Usability of a Smartphone Delivered Museum Guide. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 97. 629–637. 21 indexed citations
15.
Power, Christopher, et al.. (2013). Comparing the comprehensiveness of three expert inspection methodologies for detecting errors in interactive systems. Safety Science. 62. 286–294. 1 indexed citations
16.
Petrie, Helen, et al.. (2011). The value chain for web accessibility : challenges and opportunities. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 8 indexed citations
17.
Freire, André Pimenta, Helen Petrie, & Christopher Power. (2011). Empirical results from an evaluation of the accessibility of websites by dyslexic users. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 11 indexed citations
18.
Paige, Richard F., Gøran K. Olsen, Dimitrios S. Kolovos, Steffen Zschaler, & Christopher Power. (2010). Building Model-Driven Engineering Traceability. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 1 indexed citations
19.
Petrie, Helen, Christopher Power, & David Swallow. (2009). Students with disabilities in higher education: challenges and tactile solutions. Art Libraries Journal. 34(2). 35–40. 6 indexed citations
20.
Power, Christopher, André Pimenta Freire, & Helen Petrie. (2009). Integrating Accessibility Evaluation into Web Engineering Processes. International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering. 4(4). 54–77. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026