Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study
19973.1k citationsChristopher Murray, Alan D LópezThe Lancetprofile →
Quantifying community assembly processes and identifying features that impose them
20131.7k citationsJames Stegen, Xueju Lin et al.The ISME Journalprofile →
Evidence-Based Health Policy—Lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study
19961.6k citationsChristopher Murray, Alan D Lópezprofile →
Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000
20041.3k citationsColin Mathers, Christopher Murray et al.profile →
Update on the Global Burden of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in 1990-2013: The GBD 2013 Study
2015922 citationsGeorge A. Mensah, Christopher Murray et al.profile →
Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research
2004690 citationsChristopher Murray, Joshua A. Salomon et al.profile →
2000657 citationsChristopher Murray et al.profile →
Eight Americas: Investigating Mortality Disparities across Races, Counties, and Race-Counties in the United States
2006537 citationsChristopher Murray et al.profile →
Global, regional, and national age–sex specifi c all-cause andcause-specifi c mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of DiseaseStudy 2013
2015456 citationsAlan D López, Christopher Murray et al.profile →
Cause-specific mortality by county, race, and ethnicity in the USA, 2000–19: a systematic analysis of health disparities
202352 citationsLaura Dwyer‐Lindgren, Parkes Kendrick et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Murray
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Murray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Murray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Murray more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Murray
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Murray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Murray. The network helps show where Christopher Murray may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Murray
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Murray.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Murray based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Murray. Christopher Murray is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Murray, Christopher, et al.. (2018). Grades, Behavior, and Engagement of Adolescents with Disabilities: An Examination of Social Relationships among Students, Parents, and Teachers.. The School community journal/School community journal. 28(2). 47–62.
9.
Murray, Christopher, et al.. (2015). Rethinking the Regulatory Environment of Competency-Based Education. AEI Series on Competency-Based Higher Education..1 indexed citations
10.
Stegen, James, Xueju Lin, Jim Fredrickson, et al.. (2013). Quantifying community assembly processes and identifying features that impose them. The ISME Journal. 7(11). 2069–2079.1747 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Lombardi, Allison, et al.. (2013). University Faculty Attitudes toward Disability and Inclusive Instruction: Comparing Two Institutions.. The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. 26(3). 221–232.47 indexed citations
12.
Carroll, Kenneth C., et al.. (2011). Coupling of STOMP and ABAQUS for Hydro-Geomechanical Modeling of Fluid Flow and Rock Deformation Associated with Subsurface CO2 Injection. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2011.1 indexed citations
Bleich, Sara N., Emre Özaltin, & Christopher Murray. (2009). How Does Satisfaction with the Health-Care System Relate to Patient experience?/Quel Lien Existe-T-Il Entre la Satisfaction a L'egard Du Systeme De Sante et L'experience Des Soins Vecue Par Les patients?/Relacion Entre la Satisfaccion Con El Sistema De Atencion Sanitaria Y la Experiencia Personal De Los Pacientes. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 87(4). 271.2 indexed citations
Murray, Christopher, et al.. (1998). Employment Earnings and Hours of High-School Graduates with Learning Disabilities through the First Decade after Graduation.. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 13(1). 53–64.18 indexed citations
18.
Murray, Christopher & Arnab Acharya. (1997). Understanding DALYs. Journal of Health Economics. 16(6). 703–730.408 indexed citations
19.
Murray, Christopher, et al.. (1997). The Employment and Engagement Status of High School Graduates with Learning Disabilities through the First Decade after Graduation.. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 12(3).10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.