Christopher M. Schalk

930 total citations
53 papers, 500 citations indexed

About

Christopher M. Schalk is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher M. Schalk has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 500 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Ecology, 29 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 25 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Christopher M. Schalk's work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (27 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (13 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers). Christopher M. Schalk is often cited by papers focused on Amphibian and Reptile Biology (27 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (13 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers). Christopher M. Schalk collaborates with scholars based in United States, Bolivia and Guyana. Christopher M. Schalk's co-authors include Carmen G. Montaña, Daniel Saenz, Michael V. Cove, Thomas M. Luhring, Lee A. Fitzgerald, Kirk O. Winemiller, Erik R. Wild, David A. Patrick, James P. Gibbs and Sean T. Giery and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Forest Ecology and Management and Ecological Indicators.

In The Last Decade

Christopher M. Schalk

43 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Christopher M. Schalk United States 13 276 272 179 139 118 53 500
Carmen A. Úbeda Argentina 12 180 0.7× 343 1.3× 134 0.7× 175 1.3× 175 1.5× 59 499
Danae Moore Australia 8 200 0.7× 201 0.7× 179 1.0× 96 0.7× 155 1.3× 10 408
Daryl R. Karns United States 12 159 0.6× 246 0.9× 95 0.5× 119 0.9× 83 0.7× 27 361
Angélique Dupuch Canada 13 244 0.9× 138 0.5× 181 1.0× 118 0.8× 60 0.5× 33 398
Molly K. Grace United Kingdom 11 283 1.0× 113 0.4× 158 0.9× 65 0.5× 162 1.4× 26 456
Anne Delestrade France 14 320 1.2× 184 0.7× 166 0.9× 239 1.7× 228 1.9× 29 646
L. Kealoha Freidenburg United States 11 393 1.4× 513 1.9× 272 1.5× 219 1.6× 330 2.8× 18 734
Lloyd R. Gamble United States 7 439 1.6× 329 1.2× 166 0.9× 108 0.8× 196 1.7× 8 605
S. D. Howard Australia 7 193 0.7× 258 0.9× 108 0.6× 125 0.9× 185 1.6× 8 403
Steven R. Morey United States 5 131 0.5× 319 1.2× 91 0.5× 275 2.0× 96 0.8× 7 431

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher M. Schalk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher M. Schalk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher M. Schalk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher M. Schalk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher M. Schalk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher M. Schalk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher M. Schalk. The network helps show where Christopher M. Schalk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher M. Schalk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher M. Schalk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher M. Schalk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher M. Schalk. Christopher M. Schalk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Schalk, Christopher M., Alex J. Jensen, Benjamin R. Goldstein, et al.. (2025). iNaturalist and Structured Mammal Surveys Reflect Similar Species Richness but Capture Different Species Pools Across the United States. Ecology and Evolution. 15(7). e71805–e71805.
3.
Montaña, Carmen G., et al.. (2025). Resource niche partitioning and overlap among native and non-native lizards in an urban environment. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 103. 1–12.
4.
Saenz, Daniel, et al.. (2024). The Influence of Management Practice on the Snakes in Forest Food Webs. Herpetological Monographs. 38(1).
5.
Montaña, Carmen G., et al.. (2024). Intraspecific Variation in Mercury Contamination of Alligator Snapping Turtles (Macrochelys temminckii). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 43(8). 1903–1913.
6.
Montaña, Carmen G., et al.. (2023). Changes in taxonomic and functional diversity of an urban stream fish assemblage: A 30-year perspective. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 10. 5 indexed citations
7.
8.
Driver, Sam, et al.. (2023). Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on the At-Risk Species Anaxyrus microscaphus (The Arizona Toad): A Local and Range-Wide Habitat Suitability Analysis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(4). 762–778. 1 indexed citations
9.
Comer, Christopher E., et al.. (2021). Avian Responses to Vegetation Changes From Post Oak Savanna Restoration Efforts in Eastern Texas. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. 12(1). 61–69.
10.
Schalk, Christopher M., et al.. (2020). Activity Level-Predation Risk Tradeoff in a Tadpole Guild: Implications for Community Organization Along the Hydroperiod Gradient. The American Midland Naturalist. 183(2). 223–232. 3 indexed citations
11.
Saenz, Daniel, et al.. (2020). Risk of Snake Entanglement Is Affected by Installation Method of Erosion Control Blankets. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. 11(1). 273–278. 1 indexed citations
12.
Matich, Philip & Christopher M. Schalk. (2019). Move it or lose it: interspecific variation in risk response of pond-breeding anurans. PeerJ. 7. e6956–e6956. 4 indexed citations
13.
Schalk, Christopher M. & Michael V. Cove. (2018). Squamates as prey: Predator diversity patterns and predator-prey size relationships. Food Webs. 17. e00103–e00103. 27 indexed citations
14.
Daza, Juan D., et al.. (2017). Predation on Southern Turnip-tailed geckos (Thecadactylus solimoensis) by a Spectacled Owl (Pulsatrix perspicillata). Cuadernos de herpetología. 31(1). 37–39. 3 indexed citations
15.
Luhring, Thomas M., Grant M. Connette, & Christopher M. Schalk. (2016). Trap characteristics and species morphology explain size-biased sampling of two salamander species. Amphibia-Reptilia. 37(1). 79–89. 7 indexed citations
16.
Schalk, Christopher M. & Lee A. Fitzgerald. (2015). Ontogenetic shifts in ambush-site selection of a sit-and-wait predator, the Chacoan Horned Frog (Ceratophrys cranwelli). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 93(6). 461–467. 9 indexed citations
17.
Schalk, Christopher M. & Daniel Saenz. (2015). Environmental drivers of anuran calling phenology in a seasonal Neotropical ecosystem. Austral Ecology. 41(1). 16–27. 45 indexed citations
18.
Schalk, Christopher M., et al.. (2014). Reproductive strategies of two Neotropical killifish, Austrolebias vandenbergi and Neofundulus ornatipinnis (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae) in the Bolivian Gran Chaco. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
19.
Montaña, Carmen G., et al.. (2014). New vertebrate prey for the aquatic salamander Amphiuma means (Caudata: Amphiumidae). Herpetology notes. 7. 755–756. 3 indexed citations
20.
Schalk, Christopher M. & Thomas M. Luhring. (2010). Vagility of Aquatic Salamanders: Implications for Wetland Connectivity. Journal of Herpetology. 44(1). 104–109. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carmen A. Úbeda Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Danae Moore Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daryl R. Karns Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Angélique Dupuch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Molly K. Grace Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anne Delestrade Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. Kealoha Freidenburg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lloyd R. Gamble Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. D. Howard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Steven R. Morey
Rankless by CCL
2026