Christopher Jagge

627 total citations
9 papers, 408 citations indexed

About

Christopher Jagge is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher Jagge has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 408 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 7 papers in Insect Science and 4 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Christopher Jagge's work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (6 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers). Christopher Jagge is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (6 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers). Christopher Jagge collaborates with scholars based in United States, Cyprus and Greece. Christopher Jagge's co-authors include Patricia V. Pietrantonio, Hubert Amrein, Jesse Slone, Ahmet Yavuz, Shinsuke Fujii, Xiangyu Song, Linda S. Ross, Larry L. Keeley, Ronald J. Nachman and Rola Barhoumi and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Biology, PLoS Biology and Journal of Nutrition.

In The Last Decade

Christopher Jagge

9 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Christopher Jagge United States 8 329 200 107 84 70 9 408
Kiyoshi Asaoka Japan 13 375 1.1× 281 1.4× 158 1.5× 72 0.9× 50 0.7× 36 492
Rati Bell Switzerland 4 403 1.2× 214 1.1× 227 2.1× 42 0.5× 29 0.4× 4 457
Ryan Matthew Joseph United States 7 487 1.5× 295 1.5× 232 2.2× 50 0.6× 91 1.3× 7 597
Diya Banerjee United States 6 302 0.9× 154 0.8× 103 1.0× 211 2.5× 121 1.7× 7 665
Esther Alcorta Spain 14 418 1.3× 260 1.3× 175 1.6× 86 1.0× 25 0.4× 29 517
Anggie J Ferrer United States 5 315 1.0× 142 0.7× 163 1.5× 35 0.4× 24 0.3× 5 355
Pinky Kain India 8 227 0.7× 119 0.6× 69 0.6× 42 0.5× 40 0.6× 15 277
Habibe K. Üçpunar Germany 4 223 0.7× 105 0.5× 108 1.0× 36 0.4× 29 0.4× 5 277
Willem J. Laursen United States 12 291 0.9× 87 0.4× 93 0.9× 154 1.8× 44 0.6× 15 556
Tuhin S. Chakraborty United States 9 252 0.8× 123 0.6× 133 1.2× 40 0.5× 15 0.2× 11 327

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Jagge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Jagge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Jagge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Jagge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Jagge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Jagge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Jagge. The network helps show where Christopher Jagge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Jagge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Jagge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Jagge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Jagge. Christopher Jagge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Fujii, Shinsuke, et al.. (2023). RNA Taste Is Conserved in Dipteran Insects. Journal of Nutrition. 153(5). 1636–1645. 4 indexed citations
2.
Thorne, Natasha, et al.. (2018). The taste of ribonucleosides: Novel macronutrients essential for larval growth are sensed by Drosophila gustatory receptor proteins. PLoS Biology. 16(8). e2005570–e2005570. 23 indexed citations
3.
Fujii, Shinsuke, Ahmet Yavuz, Jesse Slone, et al.. (2015). Drosophila Sugar Receptors in Sweet Taste Perception, Olfaction, and Internal Nutrient Sensing. Current Biology. 25(5). 621–627. 167 indexed citations
4.
Yavuz, Ahmet, Christopher Jagge, Jesse Slone, & Hubert Amrein. (2014). A genetic tool kit for cellular and behavioral analyses of insect sugar receptors. Fly. 8(4). 189–196. 33 indexed citations
5.
Jagge, Christopher & Patricia V. Pietrantonio. (2008). Diuretic hormone 44 receptor in Malpighian tubules of the mosquito Aedes aegypti : evidence for transcriptional regulation paralleling urination. Insect Molecular Biology. 17(4). 413–426. 26 indexed citations
6.
Vassiliou, Vassilis A., Christopher Jagge, Maria Grispou, Patricia V. Pietrantonio, & Anastasia Tsagkarakou. (2008). Note: Biotype status ofBemisia tabaci from various crops in Cyprus. Phytoparasitica. 36(4). 400–404. 8 indexed citations
7.
Pietrantonio, Patricia V., et al.. (2005). The mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.) leucokinin receptor is a multiligand receptor for the three Aedes kinins. Insect Molecular Biology. 14(1). 55–67. 48 indexed citations
8.
Pietrantonio, Patricia V., et al.. (2001). Cloning and expression analysis of a 5HT7‐like serotonin receptor cDNA from mosquito Aedes aegypti female excretory and respiratory systems. Insect Molecular Biology. 10(4). 357–369. 48 indexed citations
9.
Pietrantonio, Patricia V., Christopher Jagge, Larry L. Keeley, & Linda S. Ross. (2000). Cloning of an aquaporin‐like cDNA and in situ hybridization in adults of the mosquito Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Insect Molecular Biology. 9(4). 407–418. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026