Christopher J. Good
- Surgery
- Pharmacology
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- B. LivingstoneMark A. JonesBrian J GleberzonRobert CoopersteinJohn J. TrianoBrian BudgellThomas F. BergmannJeffrey M. Spraggins
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers)Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers)Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Christopher J. Good
18 papers receiving 303 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Surgery 112
- Pharmacology 90
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 84
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 47
- Molecular Biology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. Good
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. Good more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. Good
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. Good. The network helps show where Christopher J. Good may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher J. Good
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher J. Good. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher J. Good based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher J. Good. Christopher J. Good is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 33 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | The Mcmaster Problem-Based Learning Method: An Analysis And Its Relevance To Chiropractic Education | 0 |
| 11 | Reflections on the Teaching Strategies Used in Teaching the Chiropractic Adjustment | 0 |
| 12 | Aspects of Learning Issues Relevant to the Chiropractic Adjustment | 0 |
| 13 | 89 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | Arthroscopy in sporting and sedentary children and adolescents. | 3 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Christopher J. Good
Christopher J. Good is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 23 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (4 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (84 citations) and Pharmacology (90 citations). Christopher J. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include B. Livingstone, Mark A. Jones, Brian J Gleberzon, Robert Cooperstein, John J. Triano, Brian Budgell, Thomas F. Bergmann, Jeffrey M. Spraggins, Richard M. Caprioli and Elizabeth K. Neumann. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Chemosphere and Digestive Diseases and Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.