Christopher J. Dixon
- Genetics top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology top 10%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Frederick R. SchramDmitry A. FilatovShane T. AhyongGerald M. SchneeweissPeter SchönswetterMaxim V. KapralovAaron J. WindsorToni I. Gossmann
- Topics
- Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers)Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers)Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Christopher J. Dixon
26 papers receiving 695 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Genetics 310
- Molecular Biology 254
- Ecology 231
- Plant Science 174
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 169
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. Dixon
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. Dixon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. Dixon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. Dixon. The network helps show where Christopher J. Dixon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher J. Dixon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher J. Dixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher J. Dixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher J. Dixon. Christopher J. Dixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 190 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 44 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 110 | |
| 20 | Sampling methods for geographical research | 32 |
About Christopher J. Dixon
Christopher J. Dixon is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science and Ophthalmology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers) and Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (148 citations), Genetics (310 citations) and Ecology (231 citations). Christopher J. Dixon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Frederick R. Schram, Dmitry A. Filatov, Shane T. Ahyong, Gerald M. Schneeweiss, Peter Schönswetter, Maxim V. Kapralov, Aaron J. Windsor, Toni I. Gossmann, Adam Eyre‐Walker and Bao‐Hua Song. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Evolution and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.