Christopher J. Deloye
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Co-authors
- Lars BildstenRonald E. TaamC. O. HeinkeC. WinisdoerfferG. ChabrierG. NelemansP. G. JonkerV. Kalogera
- Topics
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (7 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers)Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (5 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Christopher J. Deloye
14 papers receiving 447 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 431
- Geophysics 103
- Biomedical Engineering 41
- Instrumentation 34
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 34
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. Deloye
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. Deloye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. Deloye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. Deloye more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. Deloye
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. Deloye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. Deloye. The network helps show where Christopher J. Deloye may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher J. Deloye
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher J. Deloye. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher J. Deloye based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher J. Deloye. Christopher J. Deloye is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 51 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 106 | |
| 14 | 57 |
About Christopher J. Deloye
Christopher J. Deloye is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics and Media Technology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (431 citations), Instrumentation (34 citations) and Geophysics (103 citations). Christopher J. Deloye has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lars Bildsten, Ronald E. Taam, C. O. Heinke, C. Winisdoerffer, G. Chabrier, G. Nelemans, P. G. Jonker, V. Kalogera, B. Willems and Jing Zhong. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.