Christopher D. Spicer
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 2%
- Organic Chemistry top 1%
- Click Chemistry and Applications
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Benjamin G. DavisMolly M. StevensAnaëlle DumasLukas LercherColine JumeauxBakul GuptaTherese TriemerE. Thomas Pashuck
- Journals
- Chemical Communications (3 papers)Chemistry of Materials (2 papers)Chemical Science (2 papers)Acta Biomaterialia (2 papers)Chem (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenAustralia
In The Last Decade
Christopher D. Spicer
34 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Biomaterials 623
- Organic Chemistry 1.3k
- Molecular Medicine 180
- Molecular Biology 1.9k
- Pharmaceutical Science 110
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher D. Spicer
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher D. Spicer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher D. Spicer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher D. Spicer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher D. Spicer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher D. Spicer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher D. Spicer. The network helps show where Christopher D. Spicer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher D. Spicer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 14 | Hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering: the importance of polymer choice Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 385 |
| 15 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 16 | Peptide and protein nanoparticle conjugates: versatile platforms for biomedical applications Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 388 |
| 17 | 2018 | 185 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 57 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 93 |
About Christopher D. Spicer
Christopher D. Spicer is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Biomaterials, Organic Chemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Molecular Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (12 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (11 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (6 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (4 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (4 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (3 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (3 papers) and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (623 citations), Organic Chemistry (1.3k citations), Molecular Medicine (180 citations), Molecular Biology (1.9k citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (110 citations). Christopher D. Spicer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin G. Davis, Molly M. Stevens, Anaëlle Dumas, Lukas Lercher, Coline Jumeaux, Bakul Gupta, Therese Triemer, E. Thomas Pashuck, Yuya A. Lin and Zhanghua Gao. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Communications, Chemistry of Materials, Chemical Science, Acta Biomaterialia and Chem.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.