Christopher Bools
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
-
- Child Abuse and Related Trauma
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Child Abuse and Trauma 6
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 2
- Family and Disability Support Research 1
-
- Child Abuse and Related Trauma 6
- Co-authors
- S R Meadow (2 shared papers)Roy Meadow (2 shared papers)Ian Berg (1 shared paper)Imogen Brown (1 shared paper)Janet Foster (1 shared paper)David Cottrell (1 shared paper)Richard Guy Wilson (1 shared paper)Jenny Gray (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Child Abuse & Neglect (2 papers)Archives of Disease in Childhood (2 papers)Children & Society (1 paper)Child Abuse Review (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Christopher Bools
10 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Clinical Psychology 298
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 265
- Emergency Medicine 68
- Sociology and Political Science 139
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 32
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Bools
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Bools's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Bools with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Bools more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Bools
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Bools. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Bools. The network helps show where Christopher Bools may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Bools, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 95 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 69 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 67 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 1 |
About Christopher Bools
Christopher Bools is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science, Emergency Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (6 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (4 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (298 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (265 citations), Emergency Medicine (68 citations), Sociology and Political Science (139 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (32 citations). Christopher Bools has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include S R Meadow, Roy Meadow, Ian Berg, Imogen Brown, Janet Foster, David Cottrell, Richard Guy Wilson, Jenny Gray and Will Mason. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Children & Society, Child Abuse Review and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.