Christopher Bools

560 total citations
10 papers, 367 citations indexed

About

Christopher Bools is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher Bools has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 367 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Christopher Bools's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (6 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (4 papers). Christopher Bools is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (6 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (4 papers). Christopher Bools collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Christopher Bools's co-authors include S R Meadow, Roy Meadow, Janet Foster, Ian Berg, Imogen Brown, David Cottrell, Jenny Gray, Will Mason and Richard Guy Wilson and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Christopher Bools

10 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Christopher Bools United Kingdom	7	298	265	139	68	64	10	367
Kay Heoung Heo South Korea	7	206 0.7×	123 0.5×	22 0.2×	3 0.0×	137 2.1×	13	309
Katharina M. Ruhe Switzerland	11	92 0.3×	262 1.0×	88 0.6×	3 0.0×	34 0.5×	14	358
Tom Bailey United Kingdom	9	166 0.6×	52 0.2×	38 0.3×	3 0.0×	37 0.6×	19	240
Gillian Armour United Kingdom	3	217 0.7×	43 0.2×	28 0.2×	5 0.1×	37 0.6×	5	290
Richard Dalton United States	10	275 0.9×	32 0.1×	31 0.2×	8 0.1×	33 0.5×	19	327
Yuval Ziv Israel	10	273 0.9×	53 0.2×	81 0.6×	3 0.0×	19 0.3×	14	357
Julie Taylor United Kingdom	10	194 0.7×	34 0.1×	58 0.4×	4 0.1×	14 0.2×	27	281
Jackson M. A. Hewitt Canada	5	228 0.8×	28 0.1×	32 0.2×	23 0.3×	22 0.3×	13	300
Wendy den Dunnen Canada	12	258 0.9×	27 0.1×	24 0.2×	10 0.1×	28 0.4×	18	332
Janice LeBel United States	9	413 1.4×	6 0.0×	51 0.4×	55 0.8×	15 0.2×	18	440

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Bools

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Bools's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Bools with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Bools more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Bools

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Bools. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Bools. The network helps show where Christopher Bools may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Bools

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Bools. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Bools based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Bools. Christopher Bools is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Gray, Jenny, et al.. (2020). Safeguarding Children When Fabricated or Induced Illness Is Suspected or Proven: Reviewing the Experiences of Local Safeguarding Children Boards in England. Child Abuse Review. 29(6). 559–573. 3 indexed citations

2.

Bools, Christopher. (2002). Family therapy for ADHD.. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 43(4). 547–547. 4 indexed citations

3.

Bools, Christopher. (2001). Trust Betrayed? Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, Inter-Agency Child Protection and Partnership with Families. Child Abuse & Neglect. 25(3). 421–422. 1 indexed citations

4.

Bools, Christopher. (1996). Factitious Illness by Proxy. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 169(3). 268–275. 28 indexed citations

5.

Bools, Christopher, et al.. (1994). Munchausen syndrome by proxy: A study of psychopathology. Child Abuse & Neglect. 18(9). 773–788. 95 indexed citations

6.

Bools, Christopher, et al.. (1993). Follow up of victims of fabricated illness (Munchausen syndrome by proxy).. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 69(6). 625–630. 67 indexed citations

7.

Bools, Christopher, et al.. (1992). Co-morbidity associated with fabricated illness (Munchausen syndrome by proxy).. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 67(1). 77–79. 74 indexed citations

8.

Bools, Christopher, et al.. (1991). Problems in the assessment and management of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy abuse. Children & Society. 5(4). 324–333. 16 indexed citations

9.

Bools, Christopher, Janet Foster, Imogen Brown, & Ian Berg. (1990). The identification of psychiatric disorders in children who fail to attend school: a cluster analysis of a non-clinical population. Psychological Medicine. 20(1). 171–181. 69 indexed citations

10.

Bools, Christopher & David Cottrell. (1990). Future child and adolescent psychiatrists: a further survey of senior registrar training. Psychiatric Bulletin. 14(10). 611–615. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact