Christopher B. Blackwood
- Plant Science top 1%
- Ecology top 2%
- Soil Science top 1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Oscar J. Valverde‐BarrantesDonald R. ZakJeffrey S. BuyerLarry M. FeinsteinMark P. WaldropKurt A. SmemoEldor A. PaulWoo Jun Sul
- Topics
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (23 papers)Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (20 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceGermany
In The Last Decade
Christopher B. Blackwood
64 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Plant Science 1.6k
- Ecology 1.1k
- Soil Science 927
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 658
- Molecular Biology 639
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher B. Blackwood
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher B. Blackwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher B. Blackwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher B. Blackwood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher B. Blackwood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher B. Blackwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher B. Blackwood. The network helps show where Christopher B. Blackwood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher B. Blackwood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher B. Blackwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher B. Blackwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher B. Blackwood. Christopher B. Blackwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 138 | |
| 19 | 263 | |
| 20 | 72 |
About Christopher B. Blackwood
Christopher B. Blackwood is a scholar working on Soil Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (23 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (20 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (927 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (658 citations) and Plant Science (1.6k citations). Christopher B. Blackwood has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Oscar J. Valverde‐Barrantes, Donald R. Zak, Jeffrey S. Buyer, Larry M. Feinstein, Mark P. Waldrop, Kurt A. Smemo, Eldor A. Paul, Woo Jun Sul, Catherine Roumet and Grégoire T. Freschet. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Trends in Ecology & Evolution and Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.