Christopher Ames

459 citations
29 papers · 257 indexed · h-index 11

Christopher Ames

24 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Christopher Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Archeology 55
  • Paleontology 171
  • Anthropology 185
  • Archeology 88
  • Space and Planetary Science 10
Replace Ken Mulvaney with:
Ken Mulvaney Australia
Auréade Henry France
Ulf-Dietrich Schoop Russia
Andrés Troncoso Chile
Doug Bailey United Kingdom
Utsav A. Schurmans United States
Rossella Duches Italy
Olivier Nieuwenhuyse Netherlands
Giuseppina Mutri Italy
Mikhail Zhilin Russia
Christopher Ames relative to Ken Mulvaney Australia Ken Mulvaney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Ken Mulvaney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Ames. The network helps show where Christopher Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Ames Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202410
2 20220
3 20223
4 20211
5 20216
6 202020
7 20209
8 202011
9 20193
10 201912
11
Revisiting the Holocene occupations at Grassridge Rockshelter, Eastern Cape, South Africa
201710
12
Weathering and Dispersal of a Cattle (Bos taurus) Carcass in the Desert of Eastern Jordan over a Six-Year Interval
20155
13 201518
14 201317
15 201318
16 20111
17 20010
18 19981
19 19912
20 19906

About Christopher Ames

Christopher Ames is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology, Anthropology, Space and Planetary Science and Archeology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (19 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (16 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (8 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (8 papers), Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (5 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (2 papers) and Archaeological Research and Protection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (55 citations), Paleontology (171 citations), Anthropology (185 citations), Archeology (88 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (10 citations). Christopher Ames has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Carlos E. Córdova, April Nowell, James T. Pokines, Michael S. Bisson, Benjamin Collins, Matthew Shaw, Alex Mackay, Brian G. Jones, Jayne Wilkins and Luke A. Gliganic. Their work appears in journals such as Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, Quaternary International, Twentieth Century Literature, Journal of Archaeological Science Reports and Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026