Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The chemistry of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 capture, regeneration and conversion
20171.3k citationsChristopher A. Trickett, Aasif Helal et al.Nature Reviews Materialsprofile →
Plasmon-Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Conversion within Metal–Organic Frameworks under Visible Light
2016568 citationsKyung Min Choi, Dohyung Kim et al.Journal of the American Chemical Societyprofile →
Definitive Molecular Level Characterization of Defects in UiO‐66 Crystals
2015436 citationsChristopher A. Trickett, Kevin J. Gagnon et al.Angewandte Chemie International Editionprofile →
Bioinspired Metal–Organic Framework Catalysts for Selective Methane Oxidation to Methanol
2018348 citationsJayeon Baek, Bunyarat Rungtaweevoranit et al.Journal of the American Chemical Societyprofile →
Three-Dimensional Metal-Catecholate Frameworks and Their Ultrahigh Proton Conductivity
2015278 citationsNhung T. T. Nguyen, Hiroyasu Furukawa et al.Journal of the American Chemical Societyprofile →
Identification of the strong Brønsted acid site in a metal–organic framework solid acid catalyst
2018239 citationsChristopher A. Trickett, Thomas M. Osborn Popp et al.Nature Chemistryprofile →
A Synthetic Route for Crystals of Woven Structures, Uniform Nanocrystals, and Thin Films of Imine Covalent Organic Frameworks
2017230 citationsYingbo Zhao, Lei Guo et al.Journal of the American Chemical Societyprofile →
Principles of Designing Extra-Large Pore Openings and Cages in Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks
2017215 citationsJingjing Yang, Yue‐Biao Zhang et al.Journal of the American Chemical Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher A. Trickett
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher A. Trickett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher A. Trickett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher A. Trickett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher A. Trickett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher A. Trickett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher A. Trickett. The network helps show where Christopher A. Trickett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher A. Trickett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher A. Trickett.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher A. Trickett based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher A. Trickett. Christopher A. Trickett is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Trickett, Christopher A., Thomas M. Osborn Popp, Ji Su, et al.. (2018). Identification of the strong Brønsted acid site in a metal–organic framework solid acid catalyst. Nature Chemistry. 11(2). 170–176.239 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Baek, Jayeon, Bunyarat Rungtaweevoranit, Xiaokun Pei, et al.. (2018). Bioinspired Metal–Organic Framework Catalysts for Selective Methane Oxidation to Methanol. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 140(51). 18208–18216.348 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Trickett, Christopher A.. (2017). Deciphering structural heterogeneity in metal-organic frameworks towards an understanding of structure-property relationships. eScholarship (California Digital Library).1 indexed citations
Yang, Jingjing, Yue‐Biao Zhang, Qi Liu, et al.. (2017). Principles of Designing Extra-Large Pore Openings and Cages in Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 139(18). 6448–6455.215 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Zhao, Yingbo, Lei Guo, Felipe Gándara, et al.. (2017). A Synthetic Route for Crystals of Woven Structures, Uniform Nanocrystals, and Thin Films of Imine Covalent Organic Frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 139(37). 13166–13172.230 indexed citations breakdown →
Trickett, Christopher A., Aasif Helal, Bassem A. Al‐Maythalony, et al.. (2017). The chemistry of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 capture, regeneration and conversion. Nature Reviews Materials. 2(8).1250 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Choi, Kyung Min, Dohyung Kim, Bunyarat Rungtaweevoranit, et al.. (2016). Plasmon-Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Conversion within Metal–Organic Frameworks under Visible Light. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 139(1). 356–362.568 indexed citations breakdown →
Trickett, Christopher A., Kevin J. Gagnon, Seungkyu Lee, et al.. (2015). Definitive Molecular Level Characterization of Defects in UiO‐66 Crystals. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 54(38). 11162–11167.436 indexed citations breakdown →
Nguyen, Nhung T. T., Hiroyasu Furukawa, Felipe Gándara, et al.. (2015). Three-Dimensional Metal-Catecholate Frameworks and Their Ultrahigh Proton Conductivity. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 137(49). 15394–15397.278 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.