Christoph Grüter
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.2%
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Insect Science top 0.2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Francis L. W. RatnieksWalter M. FarinaTomer J. CzaczkesEllouise LeadbeaterCristiano MenezesFrancisca H. I. D. SegersLuis E. AcostaMaría Sol Balbuena
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (74 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (73 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (50 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Christoph Grüter
74 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.3k
- Genetics 2.1k
- Insect Science 1.4k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 328
- Plant Science 220
Countries citing papers authored by Christoph Grüter
This map shows the geographic impact of Christoph Grüter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christoph Grüter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christoph Grüter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christoph Grüter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christoph Grüter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christoph Grüter. The network helps show where Christoph Grüter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christoph Grüter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christoph Grüter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christoph Grüter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christoph Grüter. Christoph Grüter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 117 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 124 | |
| 20 | 97 |
About Christoph Grüter
Christoph Grüter is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 77 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (74 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (73 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (50 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.3k citations), Insect Science (1.4k citations) and Genetics (2.1k citations). Christoph Grüter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Francis L. W. Ratnieks, Walter M. Farina, Tomer J. Czaczkes, Ellouise Leadbeater, Cristiano Menezes, Francisca H. I. D. Segers, Luis E. Acosta, María Sol Balbuena, Vera Lúcia Imperatriz-Fonseca and Roger Schürch. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.