Christine Bond
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Sandra EldridgeLehana ThabaneSally HopewellMichael J. CampbellGillian LancasterClaire ChanClaire ColemanSue Ross
- Topics
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers)Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Christine Bond
11 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
- General Health Professions 623
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 487
- Clinical Psychology 451
- Psychiatry and Mental health 391
- Physiology 373
Countries citing papers authored by Christine Bond
This map shows the geographic impact of Christine Bond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christine Bond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christine Bond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christine Bond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christine Bond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christine Bond. The network helps show where Christine Bond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christine Bond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christine Bond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christine Bond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christine Bond. Christine Bond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trialsbreakdown → | 1791 |
| 4 | Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Frameworkbreakdown → | 839 |
| 5 | 124 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 28 |
About Christine Bond
Christine Bond is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Virology and Rehabilitation, having authored 11 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (218 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (104 citations) and Rehabilitation (178 citations). Christine Bond has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sandra Eldridge, Lehana Thabane, Sally Hopewell, Michael J. Campbell, Gillian Lancaster, Claire Chan, Claire Coleman, Sue Ross, Katie Mellor and Saskia Eddy. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.