Christina D. Buesching
- Ecology top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Ecological Modeling top 1%
- Co-authors
- David W. MacdonaldChris NewmanChristopher NewmanYayoi KanekoYoubing ZhouMichael NoonanZhao‐Min ZhouZongqiang Xie
- Topics
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (76 papers)Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (27 papers)Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (22 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United KingdomChinaCanada
In The Last Decade
Christina D. Buesching
105 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Ecology 1.6k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 751
- Social Psychology 444
- Small Animals 412
- Ecological Modeling 366
Countries citing papers authored by Christina D. Buesching
This map shows the geographic impact of Christina D. Buesching's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christina D. Buesching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christina D. Buesching more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christina D. Buesching
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christina D. Buesching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christina D. Buesching. The network helps show where Christina D. Buesching may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christina D. Buesching
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christina D. Buesching. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christina D. Buesching based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christina D. Buesching. Christina D. Buesching is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 54 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Christina D. Buesching
Christina D. Buesching is a scholar working on Small Animals, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (76 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (27 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (366 citations), Ecology (1.6k citations) and Developmental Biology (125 citations). Christina D. Buesching has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David W. Macdonald, Chris Newman, Christopher Newman, Yayoi Kaneko, Youbing Zhou, Michael Noonan, Zhao‐Min Zhou, Zongqiang Xie, J. Waterhouse and Paul J. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.