Christel Faes

6.6k citations
216 papers · 3.9k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Christel Faes

205 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Christel Faes
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Modeling and Simulation 861
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 280
  • Statistics and Probability 387
  • Infectious Diseases 578
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 309
Replace Marc Aerts with:
Marc Aerts Belgium
David L. Buckeridge Canada
Niel Hens Belgium
Ted Cohen United States
André Charlett United Kingdom
Benjamin F. Arnold United States
Emma S. McBryde Australia
Ben S. Cooper United Kingdom
David N. Fisman Canada
Alain‐Jacques Valleron France
Christel Faes relative to Marc Aerts Belgium Marc Aerts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Marc Aerts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christel Faes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christel Faes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christel Faes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christel Faes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christel Faes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christel Faes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christel Faes. The network helps show where Christel Faes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christel Faes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christel Faes Line = papers co-authored together Christel Faes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 216 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020354
2 2011211
3 2020149
4 2006143
5 2011119
6 201282
7 200981
8 201175
9 200772
10 201572
11 201171
12 201371
13 200968
14 200560
15 202153
16 202152
17 201150
18 202150
19 201449
20 201149

About Christel Faes

Christel Faes is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Modeling and Simulation, Epidemiology, Economics and Econometrics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 216 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 epidemiological studies (54 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (48 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (18 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (16 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (16 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (15 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (14 papers) and Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (861 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (280 citations), Statistics and Probability (387 citations), Infectious Diseases (578 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (309 citations). Christel Faes has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Niel Hens, Marc Aerts, Geert Molenberghs, Philippe Beutels, Tapiwa Ganyani, Jacco Wallinga, Andrea Torneri, Cécile Kremer, Herman Goossens and Dongxuan Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Statistics in Medicine, Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology, PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health and Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact