Chris Oriet

961 total citations
37 papers, 676 citations indexed

About

Chris Oriet is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Chris Oriet has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 676 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 15 papers in Social Psychology and 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Chris Oriet's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers). Chris Oriet is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers). Chris Oriet collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Israel. Chris Oriet's co-authors include Jennifer E. Corbett, Ryan J. Fitzgerald, Pierre Jolicœur, Heather L. Price, James T. Enns, Dan J. Charman, Kadie Hozempa, Michael Tombu, Ronald A. Rensink and Michael P. Alexander and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.

In The Last Decade

Chris Oriet

37 papers receiving 664 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chris Oriet Canada 17 594 202 163 91 28 37 676
Andrey Chetverikov Iceland 18 624 1.1× 148 0.7× 200 1.2× 90 1.0× 12 0.4× 43 737
Naseem Al-Aidroos Canada 18 913 1.5× 137 0.7× 236 1.4× 56 0.6× 13 0.5× 44 1.0k
Elisa Santandrea Italy 11 865 1.5× 82 0.4× 178 1.1× 50 0.5× 12 0.4× 29 942
Min‐Shik Kim South Korea 9 745 1.3× 132 0.7× 208 1.3× 69 0.8× 14 0.5× 15 833
Lucie Charles United Kingdom 10 814 1.4× 102 0.5× 134 0.8× 47 0.5× 7 0.3× 20 905
Miranda Scolari United States 10 730 1.2× 74 0.4× 115 0.7× 61 0.7× 11 0.4× 22 799
Nancy B. Carlisle United States 17 1.3k 2.1× 182 0.9× 302 1.9× 93 1.0× 9 0.3× 42 1.3k
Timothy J. Vickery United States 12 540 0.9× 93 0.5× 163 1.0× 88 1.0× 5 0.2× 30 647
Alina Liberman United States 8 707 1.2× 69 0.3× 218 1.3× 77 0.8× 35 1.3× 14 778
Ramakrishna Chakravarthi United Kingdom 15 670 1.1× 74 0.4× 111 0.7× 89 1.0× 40 1.4× 40 743

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Oriet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Oriet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Oriet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Oriet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Oriet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Oriet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Oriet. The network helps show where Chris Oriet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chris Oriet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chris Oriet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chris Oriet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chris Oriet. Chris Oriet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2022). From Pictures to the People in Them: Averaging Within-Person Variability Leads to Face Familiarization. Psychological Science. 34(2). 252–264. 2 indexed citations
2.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2022). Within-person variability contributes to more durable learning of faces.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 76(4). 270–282. 2 indexed citations
3.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2020). Can change detection succeed when change localization fails?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 46(10). 1127–1147. 4 indexed citations
4.
Carleton, R. Nicholas, et al.. (2016). Online attention modification for social anxiety disorder: replication of a randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 46(1). 44–59. 12 indexed citations
5.
Oriet, Chris, Mamata Pandey, & Jun‐ichiro Kawahara. (2016). Attention capture without awareness in a non-spatial selection task. Consciousness and Cognition. 48. 117–128. 4 indexed citations
6.
Fitzgerald, Ryan J., Chris Oriet, & Heather L. Price. (2014). Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: A literature review and a novel methodology.. Law and Human Behavior. 39(1). 62–74. 24 indexed citations
7.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2014). Flexible cue combination in the guidance of attention in visual search. Acta Psychologica. 153. 129–138. 5 indexed citations
8.
Fitzgerald, Ryan J., Heather L. Price, & Chris Oriet. (2013). Intentionally forgetting other-race faces: Costs and benefits?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 19(2). 130–142. 3 indexed citations
9.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2012). Size and emotion averaging: Costs of dividing attention after all.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 66(1). 63–69. 26 indexed citations
10.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2012). Size averaging of irrelevant stimuli cannot be prevented. Vision Research. 79. 8–16. 56 indexed citations
11.
Fitzgerald, Ryan J., Chris Oriet, & Heather L. Price. (2011). Change detection inflates confidence on a subsequent recognition task. Memory. 19(8). 879–890. 4 indexed citations
12.
Corbett, Jennifer E. & Chris Oriet. (2011). The whole is indeed more than the sum of its parts: Perceptual averaging in the absence of individual item representation. Acta Psychologica. 138(2). 289–301. 84 indexed citations
13.
Lleras, Alejandro, et al.. (2007). A negative compatibility effect in priming of emotional faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 14(5). 908–912. 17 indexed citations
14.
Corbett, Jennifer E., Chris Oriet, & Ronald A. Rensink. (2006). The rapid extraction of numeric meaning. Vision Research. 46(10). 1559–1573. 18 indexed citations
15.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2005). Feature binding and episodic retrieval in blindness for congruent stimuli: evidence from analyses of sequential congruency. Psychological Research. 71(1). 30–41. 10 indexed citations
16.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2003). Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 29(2). 431–440. 18 indexed citations
17.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2003). Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 29(5). 1036–1049. 31 indexed citations
18.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2003). Lengthening the duration of response execution does not modulate blindness to action-compatible stimuli.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 57(1). 11–22. 7 indexed citations
19.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2003). Congruency-induced blindness: a cost-benefit analysis. Acta Psychologica. 112(3). 243–258. 9 indexed citations
20.
Oriet, Chris, et al.. (2002). Blinded by headlights.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 56(2). 65–74. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026