Chris M. Pillar
- Infectious Diseases top 2%
- Molecular Medicine top 0.5%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Clinical Biochemistry top 1%
- Co-authors
- Daniel F. SahmWolfgang HaasDeborah C. DraghiTimothy W. MorrisDean L. ShinabargerGary E. ZurenkoKevin M. KrauseKaren Joy Shaw
- Topics
- Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (23 papers)Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (17 papers)Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Chris M. Pillar
43 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Infectious Diseases 623
- Molecular Medicine 573
- Pharmacology 484
- Molecular Biology 341
- Clinical Biochemistry 291
Countries citing papers authored by Chris M. Pillar
This map shows the geographic impact of Chris M. Pillar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris M. Pillar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris M. Pillar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chris M. Pillar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris M. Pillar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris M. Pillar. The network helps show where Chris M. Pillar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chris M. Pillar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chris M. Pillar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chris M. Pillar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chris M. Pillar. Chris M. Pillar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 65 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 80 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | Mode of Action of CXA-101 Based on Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) Analysis and Timekill Kinetic (TK) Analysis | 1 |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 153 | |
| 18 | 53 | |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Chris M. Pillar
Chris M. Pillar is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (23 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (17 papers) and Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (573 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (136 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (291 citations). Chris M. Pillar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Daniel F. Sahm, Wolfgang Haas, Deborah C. Draghi, Timothy W. Morris, Dean L. Shinabarger, Gary E. Zurenko, Kevin M. Krause, Karen Joy Shaw, Clyde Thornsberry and D.F. Sahm. Their work appears in journals such as The EMBO Journal, PLoS ONE and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.