Chow S. Lam

2.6k citations
69 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 24

Chow S. Lam

68 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Chow S. Lam
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Transplantation 123
  • Family Practice 66
  • Clinical Psychology 621
  • Social Psychology 544
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 359
Replace Ric G. Steele with:
Ric G. Steele United States
Timothy F. Page United States
Elizabeth McCay Canada
Kenneth J. Tarnowski United States
Anne Révah‐Levy France
Jennifer Alvidrez United States
Patricia Liehr United States
Pierre K. Alexandre United States
Mariah Snyder United States
Robin E. Gearing United States
Chow S. Lam relative to Ric G. Steele United States Ric G. Steele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Ric G. Steele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chow S. Lam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chow S. Lam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chow S. Lam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chow S. Lam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chow S. Lam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chow S. Lam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chow S. Lam. The network helps show where Chow S. Lam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chow S. Lam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chow S. Lam Line = papers co-authored together Chow S. Lam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20122
2
Chinese Lay Theory and Mental Illness Stigma: Implications for Research and Practices
2010146
3 200935
4 200821
5 200628
6 200641
7 200455
8 20022
9
Characteristics of Rehabilitation Team Leaders: A Replication.
19997
10 199710
11
A Treatment Matching Model for Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Clients.
19963
12
Neuropsychological Indicators of Employability Following Traumatic Brain Injury.
199119
13 199023
14 19905
15
Evaluating Clinical Problem-Solving Skills through Computer Simulations
19892
16
Employment Outcomes of Private Rehabilitation Clients.
19892
17 198839
18 1988112
19
Sheltered and Supported Work Comparison: A Response to Wehman's Comments.
19871
20
Comparison of Sheltered and Supported Work Programs: A Pilot Study.
198627

About Chow S. Lam

Chow S. Lam is a scholar working on Safety Research, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (13 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (11 papers), Disability Education and Employment (9 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (123 citations), Family Practice (66 citations) and Clinical Psychology (621 citations). Chow S. Lam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Patrick W. Corrigan, Hector W. H. Tsang, Raymond Pollak, Kan Shi, Brian T. McMahon, Shenghua Jin, Kelvin M. T. Fung, Yueh‐Ting Lee, Fong Chan and Blake Angell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026