Chloe Tuck
Impact in
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
-
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 3
- Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy 2
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance 3
- Co-authors
- Diane Ashiru‐Oredope (4 shared papers)Amy Hai Yan Chan (4 shared papers)Richmond Aryeetey (4 shared papers)Richard Cooper (4 shared papers)Laura A. Gray (4 shared papers)Robert Akparibo (4 shared papers)Victoria Rutter (3 shared papers)Omotayo Olaoye (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (2 papers)International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (1 paper)Biology Open (1 paper)Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice (1 paper)Antibiotics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGhanaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Chloe Tuck
10 papers receiving 86 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 28
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 18
- Modeling and Simulation 5
- Applied Psychology 4
- General Health Professions 19
Countries citing papers authored by Chloe Tuck
This map shows the geographic impact of Chloe Tuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloe Tuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloe Tuck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chloe Tuck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloe Tuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloe Tuck. The network helps show where Chloe Tuck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Chloe Tuck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 0 |
About Chloe Tuck
Chloe Tuck is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Finance, having authored 12 papers that have together received 88 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (2 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (28 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (18 citations), Modeling and Simulation (5 citations), Applied Psychology (4 citations) and General Health Professions (19 citations). Chloe Tuck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ghana and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Diane Ashiru‐Oredope, Amy Hai Yan Chan, Richmond Aryeetey, Richard Cooper, Laura A. Gray, Robert Akparibo, Victoria Rutter, Omotayo Olaoye, Béla Novák and Marcos Malumbres. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Biology Open, Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice and Antibiotics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.